
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Michael D. Denny on January 15, 2010 at 10:47am
Permalink Reply by Liam S. on January 15, 2010 at 10:50am 
Permalink Reply by Mike Norris on January 15, 2010 at 11:45am 
Permalink Reply by Mike Norris on January 15, 2010 at 12:05pm
Permalink Reply by Michael D. Denny on January 15, 2010 at 3:06pm
Permalink Reply by Theodore Kruczek on January 15, 2010 at 12:34pm
Permalink Reply by Paul Sappington on August 27, 2012 at 6:16pm Technically, there is no such thing as a "Family crest." That's just a phrase that family history agencies in America use to sell some crest that was owned by someone in the distant past. In most countries where many crests originated, such practice would be illegal. Coat's of Arms were not owned by families, but individuals, and a Coat of Arms was often passed down from father to son, and the son could make any changes he wanted to it to reflect his own values. And in reality, you could very well design your own crest to represent you and then pass down to your children.
Great point Paul. As I read down the posts, I was hoping someone would say that. I think it is even more significant that your own crest reflect personal accomplishments and demeanor rather than using an ancestor's (though there is nothing wrong with that and can be a point of pride depending on the ancestors)
Permalink Reply by Tanner on January 15, 2010 at 12:54pm
Permalink Reply by frank jason owens on January 15, 2010 at 1:14pm
Liam S. replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
Todd Serveto replied to JSydCarton's discussion And the Fool Speaks
Brian Splash replied to Jay Moore's discussion Dealing with an ex post break up
Jess Levens replied to Matthew L Weiss's discussion Umbrellas ok?
Brian Splash replied to Matthew L Weiss's discussion Umbrellas ok?
Jack Bauer replied to Matthew L Weiss's discussion Umbrellas ok?
© 2013 Created by Brett McKay.
Powered by