Hello men,

I'm not sure if this has been covered on here, but I'm new, and would welcome any advice you may wish to offer. I'm a man of considerable girth (as my photo can attest). I've recently had some friends of mine tell me that I should stop tucking in my shirt, as this only makes me look fatter. However, I've also been told that leaving my shirt un-tucked just makes me look sloppy AND fat. I was wondering what the general consensus is. Also, if you have any weight loss advice, please feel free to offer your honest thoughts. Thanks!

dlb

Views: 811

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I say for now just tuck in your shirt and don't care about what anyone says to you. As for weight loss, you may want to consider becoming more of a vegetarian for 6 months. The only meat you should eat is fish, fish are rich in Omega which is essential for weight loss, so eat lots of fish. Drink a lot of water, I would say at least 3 liters per day. The most common reason of why it's hard to lose weight is excessive sodium levels which causes water retention in the body, so avoid using salt in your meals and NO dressings. Get dark chocolate and nuts to control your appetite at night, no late night bites. No fries, no fast food, no snacks unless they are fruits or seeds.

Nutrition is more important than workout, so you do want to make sure you get it right. You will be fine my friend. I have confidence you will reach this goal.

David,

Big man here too. Untucked= sloppy and fat. The only shirts I don't tuck in are t-shirts usually.

RSS

Latest Activity

Red_Beard replied to Joseph L. Rogers's discussion Current forms of Chivalry in the group Chivalry
"I would have to agree with a number of previous comments that geography doesn't have all that much to do with it.  I am from Nebraska and was raised with good manners.  I continually try improve my manners: i.e. standing when a woman…"
10 minutes ago
Sir replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"I assume you mean 35gjyz4r6bpo1.  That member does not exist."
27 minutes ago
Pale Horse replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"Jeez guys. Look at the date it was posted."
1 hour ago
Steven Stock replied to Pale Horse's discussion Backsliding in the group Christian Men
"Your first quote was to say that sin(ning) is not what decides who is saved. The second quote is to bring into question perseverance of the saints, if Paul seems to be saying one can indeed be disqualified.The two are not part of the same…"
1 hour ago
Mongoose replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"I do hope the moderators take a look at this. This does appear to be someone who was banned multiple times. If the moderators have viewed this, then they are welcome to delete this post."
1 hour ago
Chris Johnson replied to Shawn K's discussion External Apologetics in the group Gentlemen Apologists
"  Having never read this source material, you may simply disregard any and all contributions I may make; that said, is this a study in external apologetics in that does or does not use biblical text? That is a discussion I have had on occasion…"
1 hour ago
Mongoose replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"It may be interesting to note (and I may have even noted it earlier in this discussion, but my memory fails and I"m in the middle of paperwork and not looking it up) that Disney and almost all romantic graphics (eg: the pictures on romance…"
1 hour ago
John A. replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"Josh, is that you?  "
1 hour ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service