Many men accept that women run their relationships, their marriages. It's often the butt of many jokes in sitcoms, Hollywood movies and real life. Only in America does this seem to exist. Or does it? Is this just how it is? Or is there a better way for men to coexist in relationships?

Views: 936

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It exists, is not the norm, and there's a better way.  But:  where do you hope to go with this discussion?

If this isn't an Introduction, you can move it to another part of Forums (Relationships & Family?) even after it's posted.

Only if you let them.


JB

You have facts to support your statement? Gallup poll stuff?

Of course it's the butt of sitcoms and Hollywood, where everyone is attractive, lives in lovely huge houses and never seem to work, rather eat at fancy restaurants all the time.

That is not reality. I do know a marriage here and there where the man is passive aggressive (I oughta know, because I've been guilty of it too) but none where the woman rules.

In most of the US we culturally strive for our marriages to be partnerships, not one subjugating the other. 

The media just wants you to think that. In every family I have been close to, the man takes the lead, as he should. It's one of the stereotypes on television, that the man of the house is a stupid brute, and that a gynarchy is the perfect system in the home. Absurd. Of course both the man and woman are important and necessary for a healthy family, but the man should be more respected as the leader of household.

American women control most of the money and all the pussy.

Sounds like the impotent complaints of a bitter, lonely man.

Or one with a sense of humor.

Nope. Just da facts.

For what it's worth, I grew up in a family where my mother was the primary breadwinner (She's a corporate executive, my father is self-employed). Most of the archetypical gender roles were reversed, and it never seemed odd to me. My father did the cooking and the cleaning, mainly because he had a lot of time between service calls. Any major financial decisions were my mother's domain. To that end, that's somewhat how my relationships have always been- decision making powers equally distributed, but I do the cooking (I'm a better cook, so it makes sense). I don't particularly care who makes more money, and it's unlikely to be me (EMS doesn't pay shit, but nursing sure does). If either of us makes a power play based on gender, the other is unafraid to call bullshit. Ah, the wonders of having two people who have mastered "The Look".

"Da facts?" Any relation to "Da Rules?"

My parents spent a semester in India in the early '80s.  Growing up, they always explained that in India, the mother of the paterfamilias "ruled the roost."  When I learned about India in school as a teen, my textbooks said India was a patriarchal society; the oldest man "ruled the roost."  I talked to my parents about it.  They said the textbook might be right looking superficially at who's handling the money or interfacing with the government, but their perspective came from actually talking to women.

And I'm pretty sure the trope of the overbearing wife is fairly universal and certainly ancient.

So, no, it doesn't exist only in America, if it exists at all.

^This

In every culture I've interacted with, whatever bullshit rhetoric is spilled out in public, there's almost always a matriarch somewhere when working at the individual level.

shane..i am with you on this. being from the South, the matriarch always rules, even if the father has a titular role as "head" of household.

My guess that in south it came from Civil War when all the men were killed.

RSS

Latest Activity

John Lee Pettimore replied to Landen Augur's discussion Eligible Bachelor who can never get a date
"Maybe you're setting off their gaydar."
21 minutes ago
Brad Williams replied to adamkevinlee's discussion Meet Your Perfect Partner
"I have had great success with online dating.  I've met multiple girlfriends as well as multiple casual sex partners through online dating and the worst experience I had was a blah first date with someone who I never contacted again and who…"
1 hour ago
Brad Williams replied to Landen Augur's discussion Eligible Bachelor who can never get a date
"I read the first paragraph very intrigued by the mystery to come.  Then in the second paragraph this sentence stopped my eyes: Tah-dah!!!  Problem found.  Then I read the rest of the post with careful attention.  However,…"
2 hours ago
Brad Williams replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
"Hmmmm, a few thoughts: 1)  Kids hold down those who don't want kids, like Demetri and I.  People who really want kids don't feel held down by them.  We can't be absolute about it.  Certainly carrying two…"
3 hours ago
Thomas Patrick replied to adamkevinlee's discussion Meet Your Perfect Partner
"There is a partial truth to thisI will be honest, I met my current girlfriend online. We were both fairly young but it was fine, now we're around the age to have our relationship materialize into something real, not exclusively online. I will…"
3 hours ago
George Henry Robbins III replied to Landen Augur's discussion Eligible Bachelor who can never get a date
"Exactly!"
4 hours ago
Landen Augur replied to Landen Augur's discussion Eligible Bachelor who can never get a date
"Thank you for the encouraging word. Can I put your answer down as, "do not change what you are doing, just continue as you have been doing?""
4 hours ago
George Henry Robbins III replied to Landen Augur's discussion Eligible Bachelor who can never get a date
"Don't be discouraged. Wish I looked like you when I was 23. Don't compromise any of your beliefs and values, just continue to be yourself. Think of a turn down as a "she doesn't have a clue that she just missed out on a great guy…"
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service