This is more of a question for the war vets on here.  Is the digital camo fatigues the army uses now an improvement?  I heard that it breaks the outline better, but the one-pattern-fits all principle (except for the desert) makes it stick out more.  Is there really only one pattern?  Is it better than the splotches or tiger stripes?

Views: 277

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

WTF are you asking about?  The Digicamo pattern?  The colors?  The Army's shitty ACU's?

All three.

Wrote this up as a reply on another post:

You'd be wrong.  Here's a brief history of Army ACU's:

The Marines spent a few hundred thousand dollars testing over two dozen camoflauge patterns and materials, utilizing scientists in conjunction with Scout Snipers, and finally decided on a pattern closely resembling CADPAT developed by the Canadians for NATO.  The Marines tweaked the colors a little bit and stamped the EGA on it then issued two different color patterns; desert and green.

The Army saw it and said, "ZOMGWTFBBQ!11!!111! I CAN HAZ NAO????"

And the Marines responded with, "See this here EGA? Copyright bitches."

So the Army answered by spending several million dollars to study less than half a dozen patterns, ultimately deciding to choose a pattern which wasn't used in the testing, the Marine's.   Which they then recolored and issued with a few more pockets, which soldiers  use for the most idiotic purposes.

Once the Army fielded the new ACU grays greens they realized it doesn't work anywhere, and promptly issued the pattern used by Special Forces to everyone who was going anywhere not the PX.

So now that the history of the Army's idiotic ACUs are out of the way, here's more:

I joined the Marines in 2002, my boot camp company was the first on the West Coast to receive the digicammies.  We did a bunch of comparison tests out in the field during MCT and my MOS school in Florida, because there was still a lot of the old cammie uniforms in use.  Based on observations, the new digi pattern blows the old one away.

So some camouflage pattern theory:  Tiger Stripe (tigers) forces your eyes to "slip" past the object covered in it.  Mottled (giraffs) breaks up the outlines.  Spotted (baby deer), acts similar to mottled, on a smaller scale/closer up.  What the digital patterning does is combine the spotted with the mottled, and in the case of the AF ABU Tiger Stripe as well.  They're all rather environmentally dependent, but the digi pattern work well as a general camouflage pattern.  Environment specific (MossyOak etc) camo patterns, while highly effective, would be too specific for the military to field.

As David K pointed out, it works well under night vision, and combined with low UV/IR reflective dies and detergents, work extremely well.  Anecdotally, in the early days of Iraq, we would "lose" our guys under night vision.  It worked so well it became a hazard, now we have IR patches.

So to answer your question, the digi pattern is an improvement over the old mottled BDUs.  The Army colors are not.

If you think the ACU's are idiotic, take a look at the AF ABU's. The camo is just as useless, but someone had the brilliant idea of using buttons everywhere on them. Fucking. Buttons. Your torso pockets are useless to begin with and you can't use any of your leg pockets quickly or even get your fly open without having to undo and redo a bunch of buttons. Stupid things are designed for office work, not being deployed. Probably why the PJ's and forward air controllers don't use them. 

Then they decided to make the first generation all winter weight when we've got guys deployed in Iraq that are required to wear them. I got my issued in 2010 and it wasn't until this year that a lightweight version for hot weather was issued. 

Yeah. Everyone kinda jumped on it stupidly.

Okay, thanks.  

Both the Air Force ABU's and the Army ACU's come in a single color digital camo pattern. And frankly, unless your laying on a pile of gravel, they don't do much to help you blend in. The Marines MARPAT fatigues are digital and have different colors for woodlands, desert, and snow, so they're a bit more practical.

The digital camo does have fewer hard lines when viewed from a distance so in that respect it does work better than the splotch-style BDU's that were used before it. But the big improvement is in blending in under night vision goggles. The black areas on the old BDU's made it look like you were covered in spots when you look at it through NVG's. If you look at the new digital camo, there's no black areas so you just look like a grey, blurry blob from a distance, far better for blending in at night. 

But, all the services are probably going to be switching to using the same camo system, called MultiCam, that's in use by the special forces in Afghanistan now. 

That's stupid.  Why would they used camouflage with green in it in Afghanistan?  The best way of doing it in my opinion would be on for desert, woodland, snow, and night ops/urban.

Afghanistan is green?

The only green part of trashcanistan would be the Marines stationed there.

Or the Helmand River valley.  Or a few provinces the Army had control over (everywhere other than the Helmand).  Or, springtime.

The geographical terrain is much like the Rocky Mountain West.  Sure there's a lot of desert, but plenty of green too.  Just so happens the Marines didn't see any of it, and desert tan seems to blend in well with green.

The multicam I saw on Google has green in it, so I guess so.

RSS

Latest Activity

Milo Morris replied to Milo Morris's discussion Definitions in the group Out to Build Bridges
"Yup. None of these factors--either alone, or in combination--is typically enough to make a person depressed enough to commit suicide. Yet the gay orthodoxy continues to lay the suicides of sexual minorities at the feet of "homophobia" in…"
9 minutes ago
Vytautas replied to Pale Horse's discussion Called It in the group The Great Debate
"Because you voluntarily went out of your way to find pictures of a woman you consider unattractive, then proceeded to complain about how much she doesn't attract you, and not only that but society's ideal of beauty is completely wrong…"
12 minutes ago
Will replied to Steve Dallas's discussion First God.... in the group The Great Debate
"John, you have been economically and successfully trolled.  "
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Oscar Coles's discussion So I've started a martial arts club...
"Hit up Tony Wolfe. He hasn't posted in a while, but he's on this site."
2 hours ago
John Muir replied to Steve Dallas's discussion First God.... in the group The Great Debate
" I said I wouldn't know what I would do "just"? "
2 hours ago
Oscar Coles replied to Jack Bauer's discussion What'cha watchin'? Your manly entertainment recommendations, reviews and discussions ...
"Movies:  Kung Fu Panda 1 and 2. Good God. These films blew my expectations. Dreamworks were never known for top quality films before but Christ these films are amazing; they some of the great american comedies.  The main character, Po,…"
3 hours ago
Oscar Coles posted a discussion

So I've started a martial arts club...

So me and a group of friends have started an amateur Bartitsu society and we're pretty much teaching ourselves the martial art among elements of other fighting styles. While not ideal we're doing well, perfecting the techniques. I organise the activities and exercises and try to explain the basics of the technique from the instruction book.I was just wondering if anyone else has done something similar to this? If so do you have any tips of running these sort of clubs or interesting stories of…See More
3 hours ago
UrbaNick6 replied to Cory Ross's discussion Audio Renaissance: The Art of Manly Music
"Eh. I think musical taste is directly tied to the perception of your experiences in life and is satisfying to the level of the soul (if you believe that a soul exists). Some of that is generational, some of it is cultural, but deep down a person…"
4 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service