Hey guys,

Just wondering - how in the name of the seven hells can I answer more emails faster, and reduce the long term amount of stuff I need to answer? Yes, I know that there is a *delete*-button, but, generally, what can you recommend me there. - I am a notorious workaholic, mind you, and I realize I need to take some time off, sometimes...

Thanks,

Rafe

Views: 137

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on your situation.  To reduce the number of emails you receive, use the phone and face-to-face conversation more and email less, and encourage the same with your co-workers.  Re-evaluate what you need to be cc'd on, and whether you need to use so many cc's.

If you use Outlook, learn to use "rules". 

Also, run a few lifehacker.com and youtube searches for email management or email productivity. There are loads of principles and techniques and systems you can use to become more efficient. 

I do a lot to make this happen.  Here are some things I do, using Outlook.

* Rule:  if the mail comes to a distribution list, it automatically goes into my "mass mailings" folder.

* Rule:  if the mail has "142" in the title (that's the number of one of my classes), it goes straight to my 142 grading folder.  Students are asked not to put "142" in the title if they want an immediate response.

* Rule:  if anybody sends me something that is clearly a time-waster, I add a rule -- that person's mails go straight to my delete folder.

* Rule:  certain things in the subject line that indicate it'll waste my time ("Iraq" used to be an example) are covered by a rule that sends things to the delete folder.

* My work email never gets sent to anybody that's not an individual and a real person.  I still get spam, but not much.  My workplace has an automatic spam filter that catches 2-5 messages a week for me, and sends me a notification.  I delete the notification unread, because it's been completely accurate so far.  If I must give a web site my email, I use my "feel free to send me spam because I don't read it anyway" account on Yahoo!.

* I use folders extensively for different areas of life:  for classes, for investing, for this and that social org I'm in, for things related to my kids...

And I'm still spending half an hour today moving things around and deleting them.

Wow, thanks so much! Much to process, but many good ideas! :)

Will get back to you later, will try to implement a few of those...

I have my non-time-sensitive emails handled through unroll.me

Basically it gathers all of today's emails and formats them into a single email I will get tomorrow morning. A quick browse down that lets me know what I need to read, reply to, or just ignore. It's quite nice.

There I was going to give you guys my thanks, then, in the process of posting this, I realize I have TWO accounts here! -_- Talk about decluttering my internet... (Will contact support.)

Anyway, on topic: MANY THANKS! :) Evaluating some of the measures I took over the last few days, I can say that I am slowly wading out of the swamp that I myself created. Unroll.me seems like a feature that fits right into what I am trying to establish for myself. :)

RSS

Latest Activity

Longarm replied to Longarm's discussion Guitar Rig! in the group The Guitar = Manly
"The latest update as of March 2017"
21 minutes ago
Shane replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"This argument will come in handy over Halloween. Thanks."
26 minutes ago
Longarm replied to Braeden 2.0's discussion The Horror of Day to Day Life
"When you smell a fart or if your bathroom smells like poop, in reality you are ingesting poop particles.  So your toothbrush, towels, washcloths are all covered your or other people's fecal matter."
32 minutes ago
Charles Dodd replied to Sir's discussion Polarization, "violent rhetoric" in the group The Great Debate
"An example of how messy free speech can get: The civil rights movement lasted a decade or more. Here's the record from one particularly bad year (from Wikipedia):  "
38 minutes ago
Nick H replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"The thing us, it isn't "public art". The artist who created the charging bull still technically owns it and is rightfully pissed that his art is being used by group to promote their political agenda (gender diversity in Wall…"
1 hour ago
Liam Strain replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"Funny thing about public art though. Context changes over time anyway."
1 hour ago
Nick H replied to Lumberjoe's discussion Some People Dislike The New LGBTQ(etc.) Pride Flag Because Racism in the group The Great Debate
"I'm not a fan of the little girl statue. It basically steals another artists work, the bull, and completely changes it meaning."
1 hour ago
Charles Dodd replied to Sir's discussion Polarization, "violent rhetoric" in the group The Great Debate
"My point was that one can either: 1) Turn into a bean-counter and fight about which side said what mean things: --"Well the lefties are saying all these mean things about Trump!" --"But look, here's an internet meme showing…"
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service