Hey guys,

Just wondering - how in the name of the seven hells can I answer more emails faster, and reduce the long term amount of stuff I need to answer? Yes, I know that there is a *delete*-button, but, generally, what can you recommend me there. - I am a notorious workaholic, mind you, and I realize I need to take some time off, sometimes...

Thanks,

Rafe

Views: 110

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It depends on your situation.  To reduce the number of emails you receive, use the phone and face-to-face conversation more and email less, and encourage the same with your co-workers.  Re-evaluate what you need to be cc'd on, and whether you need to use so many cc's.

If you use Outlook, learn to use "rules". 

Also, run a few lifehacker.com and youtube searches for email management or email productivity. There are loads of principles and techniques and systems you can use to become more efficient. 

To be honest, my first step for you would be to have you evaluate why you have so many unanswered emails. Are they certain types that you just put off?

Next I would have you look at your email structure. Do you use folders? Are the emails you need to reply to getting lost in a massive inbox behind other emails that you decided to go ahead and open?

Do you look at email as soon as it arrives? Do you open based on subject/sender? Do you have a set time to open/respond to emails?

Do you use rules to move certain types of emails to folders?

Do you use reminders/tasks/due-dates on emails to send a response?

 

There is a lot I would want to know before I gave you any type of path to go on. If I gave you one that was opposite from how you work, or would require too much setup or change, it is doubtful that you would follow through, esp with a history of not following through on things you should(ie the emails that are the reason for this thread)

I do a lot to make this happen.  Here are some things I do, using Outlook.

* Rule:  if the mail comes to a distribution list, it automatically goes into my "mass mailings" folder.

* Rule:  if the mail has "142" in the title (that's the number of one of my classes), it goes straight to my 142 grading folder.  Students are asked not to put "142" in the title if they want an immediate response.

* Rule:  if anybody sends me something that is clearly a time-waster, I add a rule -- that person's mails go straight to my delete folder.

* Rule:  certain things in the subject line that indicate it'll waste my time ("Iraq" used to be an example) are covered by a rule that sends things to the delete folder.

* My work email never gets sent to anybody that's not an individual and a real person.  I still get spam, but not much.  My workplace has an automatic spam filter that catches 2-5 messages a week for me, and sends me a notification.  I delete the notification unread, because it's been completely accurate so far.  If I must give a web site my email, I use my "feel free to send me spam because I don't read it anyway" account on Yahoo!.

* I use folders extensively for different areas of life:  for classes, for investing, for this and that social org I'm in, for things related to my kids...

And I'm still spending half an hour today moving things around and deleting them.

Wow, thanks so much! Much to process, but many good ideas! :)

Will get back to you later, will try to implement a few of those...

I have my non-time-sensitive emails handled through unroll.me

Basically it gathers all of today's emails and formats them into a single email I will get tomorrow morning. A quick browse down that lets me know what I need to read, reply to, or just ignore. It's quite nice.

There I was going to give you guys my thanks, then, in the process of posting this, I realize I have TWO accounts here! -_- Talk about decluttering my internet... (Will contact support.)

Anyway, on topic: MANY THANKS! :) Evaluating some of the measures I took over the last few days, I can say that I am slowly wading out of the swamp that I myself created. Unroll.me seems like a feature that fits right into what I am trying to establish for myself. :)

RSS

Latest Activity

John Muir replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"The one that we are talking about. Is the part you don't understand that people were killed or how Yeltsin was involved in those people being killed? Lots of times for the sake of brevity the actions of people are ascribed to the leader under…"
1 hour ago
Tom Baker replied to Tom Baker's discussion Social class and masculinities
"It is from a bigger survey called the 'Great British class survey'. It's a way of updating the old tripartite class structure of lower, middle and upper. Well it's not that going to gigs etc is masculine these are related to…"
3 hours ago
Danisatan replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"And then while we died in their old fucking colony, they left NATO. Ungrateful french fucks."
3 hours ago
Shane replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"Ho Chi Minh was one of our most hard line allies during WW2, putting his life and the welfare of his troops in danger for ours. To the point he modeled his Declaration of Independence and constitution after ours. When finally confronted and asked…"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"No, it's not the name. It's that they haven't abandoned the name. Let's say we were the "Indian-killing States of America" and our flag was an Indians face with a sword going through it. Both the name and the standard…"
4 hours ago
Will replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"It may not, but if not, what an indictment of the President! But your examples don't seem relevant to that.  Cuba is better for women and infidels than Saudi or ISIS-controlled Iraq, and if your prejudices are strong enough, better than…"
4 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"Stalin technically wasn't a true communist either."
4 hours ago
Will replied to Regular Joe's discussion BREAKING: US To Normalize Relations With Cuba in the group The Great Debate
"It's hard to see what fear Obama overcame to lift the embargo.  It's not as if lifting it will have, well, any consequences on him whatsoever. And there is nothing wrong with being a pussy.  Ask anyone with a heart and a…"
4 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service