Could someone briefly explain Ayn Rand's philosophy; objectivism?

I've read "Atlas Shrugged" and would like to attempt "The Fountainhead" soon, but before I do I would like a better understanding of what Objectivism is. Could someone briefly describe the main tenets of that philosophy?

Views: 1439

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

As for the blind, unquestioning, unblinking loyalty of followers, I would suggest following Rand with L. Ron Hubbard.

Because, why not model your approach to life after works of complete fiction in a cult-like fashion?

Or "The Bible."

*eyeroll that can be seen from space*

Yeah, complete fiction.  Rand?  You've got to be kidding...

I think Whittaker Chambers said it best, back in the day.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/222482/big-sister-watching-y...

Who is Whittaker Chambers? A nobody. The only reason his name is mentioned today is in connection with his smears of Ayn Rand, who 50 years later still sells millions of books. If you want to have an opinion of a controversial author like Rand the only way is to read her works yourself.

I've read Rand.  She's a third-rate novelist and a fourth-rate philosopher.

And Chambers is primarily known today for reasons that have nothing to do with Rand.

I always preferred Buckley to Rand.  Apparently publishing Whittaker Chambers' review of Atlas Shrugged -- which WFB said went a bit too far -- in National Review caused a major rift between Rand and Buckley.  They had some philosophical differences ... mostly that he didn't share her general disdain for all altruism, not just feigned altruism of the government variety.


Rand has her moments.  She makes some solid points, and I generally like her work.  But, there are limitations to her philosophy.


JB

Which, of course, is expected.

To have the perfect philosophy implies infinite wisdom. Yet we are finite human beings.

Rand's philosophy is, in my view, ignoring any dimensions of humans we would call spiritual. But she was attempting to formulate a system of thinking and behaving that would allow humans to grow and prosper and live together peaceably. A philosophy based on rational interaction, where the initiation of physical force is considered abhorrent, seems like a reasonable start.

where the initiation of physical force is considered abhorrent

You may have missed her sex scenes.

I saw more love and affection in the love scenes from oz

Objectivism is basically the celebration of being a sociopath. 

Sociopath is in style.  Me first, always...

RSS

Latest Activity

Karl Helweg replied to Jack Neulist's discussion Finding the "Old Ones": Who really settled North America first? in the group History Buffs
"I have not read this L'Amour novel.  I am curious how the old ones tie into the story. Dorset:  "Hobbits of the Arctic"…"
2 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Will's discussion Iraqi genocide in the group The Great Debate
"Sounds more like the Joe Arpaio school of responding to an FBI information bulletin.  (It used to be "OMG, the Messicans is overrunning us!", now it's "OMG, the Ay-rabs is a gonna kill us all!" While I'm not privy…"
20 minutes ago
Native Son replied to Thomas Patrick's discussion Man of the Month Award? (speculation)
"Some might opine he's tied with Titus."
47 minutes ago
Native Son replied to M Pumpernickel's discussion Can owning a cat be manly?
"in my humble opinion, once you recal that the cat mearely suffers your existence as a source of kibble, a clean litter box, and head scratches, there's nothing unmanly about sharing your abode with a cat.  Unless of course, you totally…"
49 minutes ago
Native Son replied to John Muir's discussion Balance
"There's always physical therapy.  Had a knee injury a couple of years ago, and a goodly part of the physical rehab was working on balance and symmetry."
53 minutes ago
J. R. Thompson replied to Jack M.'s discussion What book do you think is worth re-reading and why?.
"For a light reading book: Kon-Tiki or My Side of the Mountain Longer read: the Bible"
1 hour ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to J. R. Thompson's discussion Introduction
"Welcome, JR. You'll want to go by that so you don't get confused with the Josh from across the pond."
1 hour ago
John Lee Pettimore replied to Rodney Allen Thornton's discussion Thinking of removing the long hair. Suggestions?
"What were you before?"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service