Could someone briefly explain Ayn Rand's philosophy; objectivism?

I've read "Atlas Shrugged" and would like to attempt "The Fountainhead" soon, but before I do I would like a better understanding of what Objectivism is. Could someone briefly describe the main tenets of that philosophy?

Views: 1443

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Reardon spent much of his life developing his metal just as another character spent much of his developing his engine (no names, don't want to ruin the book for others). In both, others try to guilt them into sharing their creation for the good of all instead of profiting (a virtue to many) but both refuse because to the heroes in the tale, charity is not a virtue and greed is not a sin.
Being compensated for your life's work is hardly unreasonable.

If I asked you to send me a check weekly with 70% of your pay in it, would that be reasonable? You'll note the comment inside the book where a reporter said something along the lines of "so this is lighter than steel, will outlast steel by a factor of ten and it is cheaper to buy?" And the reporter was told "oh, so you noticed that did you?"

Asking for payment is not wrong. Demanding something unearned, is.
Are you debating something I said because I don't see it in your comment

Her epistemology is that there is a reality independent of our senses, but which we can best detect through our senses. It does not seem to be a very sophisticated or developed theory of knowledge and certainly does not seem to betray any knowledge of or interaction with the field of epistemology and the many theories of knowledge from ancient to modern times.

Reality as a primary and independent of consciousness is Aristotle's discovery that Ayn Rand took as a foundation of her philosophy. Her own epistemological crowning achievement is her theory of concepts: concepts are objective, i.e. based on reality and formed by a rational method. This is her solution to the "problem of the universals". Check out Rand's "Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology" for details. And, it's only a ~100 pages long.

In between Aristotle and Rand are nearly 2500 years of philosophy, and I don't really see her engaging with any of that.

She chose to not "engage with any of that" because she considered and rejected it as being false. Was she right? You have to read her arguments.

Lack of engagement is a signal that a person doesn't have the intellectual rigor to be taken seriously.

Who cares? The bigger question is, does Ms. Rand's philosophy work? Yes, and not. Just like all of them.

To blithely make your claim implies that you can scale even higher heights.

I know little about Rand.  Did she engage with Aristotle?

Her notion of "happiness" appears to me to be related to the Aristotelian ideal.

The problem is that 'reality' (i.e. what is actually happening in the universe) is subjective to each of us and that subjectivity is due to the manner in which our senses percieve and our brain filters and prioritizes.  Then, on top of that, you have emotions thrown in for good measure.  Then, on top of that, you've got our experiences and education (about the world and life) filtering and coloring perceptions even further.  Then, on top of that, you've got your reaction to what you thought you saw; again colored by emotions, experiences, and education, and genetics (and epi-genetics).  In the end you have to ask "Did I just see what I thought I saw?".  The answer is "Yes" and "No".

RSS

Latest Activity

Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel's discussion Family in the group Gentlemen Atheists
"Don't attack them for their faith. It does nothing but make them more and more against you. I found that I would have days where I would want nothing more to burn a church down, bash down religion. But it's their life, and you have yours.…"
4 minutes ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Herb Munson's discussion Trusting in the Faithfulness of God in the group The Great Debate
"I follow a different path. That path brings me happiness. Why is your path better? Where is your god? Trouble not the world with such."
15 minutes ago
Daniel added a discussion to the group Gentlemen Atheists
Thumbnail

Family

Since losing the faith I find I have a difficult time maintaining close relationships with my parents and siblings who are strong believers. We don't fight, we all love each other, but there is a barrier that prevents anything too deep from happening. They are still faithfully waiting and expecting a prodigal son to return, so things seem to be a state of arrested development.I'd love to read about anybody's experience/success with bridging this divide in a healthy way, or of what potential…See More
16 minutes ago
Jacob Bauer replied to John Bravo's discussion I held out sex for love first....Why is it so hard to find a girl who's done the same?
"You're probably looking in the wrong place and at the wrong girls. Ignore these idiots who say you "shouldn't judge" or whatever. You laid our your criteria and you know exactly what you want in a woman. Find her and hope you…"
27 minutes ago
Jacob Bauer replied to Herb Munson's discussion Trusting in the Faithfulness of God in the group The Great Debate
""Silly" and "rigamarole" are hardly personal insults. Perhaps he does find your position silly. He was still respectful of the people supporting it, as far as I read. I think you're trying to find an excuse to avoid his…"
40 minutes ago
Rush replied to Rush's discussion Praying for Wife Material. Selfish Prayer? in the group Christian Men
"I agree that Faith without deeds is dead. God helps, but I have to work at it too. I don't think that praying out of money for your own ambitions that do not have God is good. For example I think its good to pray for success in Him through many…"
47 minutes ago
Nathanael replied to John Bravo's discussion I held out sex for love first....Why is it so hard to find a girl who's done the same?
"Reread what he wrote.  If he was interested in morals or values he'd be asking women about their beliefs and how they behave now, not whether they've ever had casual sex.  This is about his own psychological and sexual hang-ups,…"
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to John Bravo's discussion I held out sex for love first....Why is it so hard to find a girl who's done the same?
"Immoral from a point a view. Morals change. You shouldn't look down on someone because they don't fit your general moral code."
2 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service