Could someone briefly explain Ayn Rand's philosophy; objectivism?

I've read "Atlas Shrugged" and would like to attempt "The Fountainhead" soon, but before I do I would like a better understanding of what Objectivism is. Could someone briefly describe the main tenets of that philosophy?

Views: 1465

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

As far as I can tell, there's no room for love.

What makes you say that? I love my wife dearly, and do many things for her freely, including making sacrifices. But I am not an altruist because I DO love her,and the relationship beings me joy.

That is an objectivist trait: does this make me happy and enhance my life, though I wouldn't call myself a die hard objectivist.

Her archetypes don't know love.  They don't express it.  They don't experience it.  Any semblance of what passes for lovemaking to her, is reached through mutual agreement to engage in prurient pleasure.  It's more like integrated mutual masturbation than fulfillment of emotional need.  Which is fine.  It's the reason we have fuck buddies today.  But, it ain't Romeo and Juliet.

Liam..thank you for this explanation....as a person who devoured and loved Rand when i was 18, you have done a good job. Her fiction books are novels...what she wrote about in her idealized books were idealized characters that expressed ideals of her philosophy, well stated by Liam above. From what I have read and seen of her interviews and writing, she is not quite as dogmatic as her characters in person.

If you dont want to jump into Atlas Shrugged, the short book Anthem is a good start. Or just read the wikipedia on her and some of her non fiction writings.

Just personally, the books have not worn as well with me over the years, and some of her dogmatic fans (see Liam's quote below) do not do her credit because of their self righteousness. However, she really is an important person to understand the dynamics of todays politics... One thing i think fascinating is a discussion of her taking Social Security..she did not want to sign up, but used Social Security as she had paid in... Issues like Social Security are not in the fiction books...

Greed is good.

Put alternatively: I got mine. Fuck everyone else.

Or, put more accurately, don't get in my way and I won't get in yours.  So each of us can pursue what we want, without interference.

Problem is, there’s not much of consequence that you can do that doesn’t impinge on others in one way or another.

Depends on how loosely you define "impinge".


JB

No, depends on how others (those being "impinged") define the term.

That somebody feels "impinged" certainly doesn't necessarily mean they were.  A truer statement might be "there's not much of consequence you can do without bothering somebody's inflated sense of entitlement in one way or another".

 

JB

"there's not much of consequence you can do without bothering somebody's inflated sense of entitlement in one way or another."

But isn’t that a line drawing game?  “What you deem "consequential" is automatically evenhanded while others have an “inflated sense of entitlement.”  Life doesn't work that way Jack. 

RSS

Latest Activity

Josh Allen replied to Chu Kim's discussion Ruled by Women
"Just ignore John, he is old and bitter."
1 minute ago
Liam Strain replied to John Moser's discussion Having discovered why The Odyssey is so poorly written, I now know of a new skill we must recover!
"FYI - Fowler's provides a few instances where a comma splice is acceptable. "
4 minutes ago
Native Son replied to John Moser's discussion Having discovered why The Odyssey is so poorly written, I now know of a new skill we must recover!
"Correct.  Since he actually made a living from his poetry.  Ever read "Rhymes of a Red-Cross Man"?"
8 minutes ago
Henry H. commented on thehuhman's group Men Over 50
"@Native Son: LOL, will you be by post-50 mentor in curmudgeonliness?"
27 minutes ago
Will replied to John Moser's discussion Having discovered why The Odyssey is so poorly written, I now know of a new skill we must recover!
"Yes, I was thinking of a particular undergrad class for all majors.  It assumes no expertise but hopes to show students can reasonably express an coherent argument, and often fails in that hope, I'm afraid.  Even a class for majors…"
29 minutes ago
Jim Gratner replied to Jim Gratner's discussion Divorce and Annulments in the group Catholic Men
"I was too. Some diocese it isn't obscene, a few hundred dollars. But some can be much more. I think it depends on some of the "optional" parts of the process - like if one party requests a psych evaluation or if witnesses have to…"
1 hour ago
Jim Gratner replied to Jim Gratner's discussion Divorce and Annulments in the group Catholic Men
"1. Probably so, that's the main reason for the synod and one of the points made in the article. There are too many variations from diocese to diocese. 2. Read several places where I mentioned I don't mean my specific case, and don't…"
1 hour ago
Chu Kim replied to Chu Kim's discussion Ruled by Women
"No I don't. I have my own apartment, thank you for asking. But a while ago, I read his comments regarding a post about living with parents. He had a lot to say on the matter, as this was one of the only areas where he has actual…"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service