So, I write a comment on the post about veterans today. Hit the "submit" button. See the "this comment is awaiting moderation" message. Then -- about 5 hours later-- my comment is still not there.

I didn't used bad words, nor did I write anything that I could regard as offensive to others.

So why was it censored? Because I don't agree with the author or the site owner?
I'm really upset about this. I don't think my opinion is any better than the next guy's, but I certanly do think it's JUST as important as his.

Has anybody had a similar issue in the past?

P.S. If you were about to write something like "well, it's Brett's blog, so if you don't like it just leave", please note that I do like the blog --a lot. But I also like virtues such as intelectual honesty, opennes and transparency.

Views: 1232

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've had it happen to me on many occaisions on a lot of sites....It's all about conformity....Sometimes your opinion just doesn't mesh with the general public's, you're not following the Sheeple.

 

I think it is very important to hear both sides of an argument....The opinion of men on both sides of the room.  But when the man on the other side of the room says something that goes against the mainstream and brings up issues people don't want to acknowledge, that man has to be silenced, because surely someone out of the masses will recognize this man is right, and then it spreads like a disease, and soon, there's a huge shift in thinking that the powers that be just cannot abide by as they feel threatened.

 

....I am NOT a right-wing lunatic, nor am I some weird conspiracy theorist...Just sayin....

It could be that Brett, or the other powers that be, simply haven't been around to approve the comment. Also I have noticed that Brett seems to try and avoid conflict in the main threads. This is why they have the Great Debate thread and such. So he may have felt that your comment, while not offensive in it self, may have cause the thread to become unruly.

To open a public forum and then avoiding conflict seems contradictory to me. I understand the need for moderation (avoiding spam and whatnot) but I'm positive my comment was rejected because of my point of view on celebrating war veterans.

Message Brett and ask him.  He's online now.

What was your comment?

Thanks for the heads up! I have just asked him.

Don't have a copy of the comment, but I wanted to say two things:

1) That I don't believe in honour people who kills other people

2) That not every war the US has fought had the purpose of preserving or achieving freedom

Yep. You probably got blocked.

Maybe Brett wanted his Veterans Day post, and it's comments section, to be about American Veterans rather than your petty European political gripes. I don't blame him for not letting you derail the comment section.

JB

I would argue that a great way to honor veterans is allow the exercise of the free speech that veterans protect.

I'm sure you would. But, this isn't a matter if free speech. It never was. AOM is not obligated to let somebody hijack it's comments section with a debate it'd rather not entertain at the moment.

JB

I feel like you're being hypocritical, JB. Calling Tomas petty while you yourself are. It's one thing to point out a man's errors. It's another thing to degrade his opinion in the process. 

I wouldn't want to denigrate your "feelings", but you're wrong.

To attempt to hijack a post meant to honor sacrifice, instead making it a debate about your personal non-American viewpoint on the American military is petty. Pointing out that it is petty is not similarly petty.

It is degrading, I suppose, but degrading and petty aren't the same thing. So, there's no hypocrisy.

JB

I'm an American and I don't think that there's anything wrong with non-Americans commenting on the meaning of Veterans' Day. It is also celebrated in many other places as Armistice Day!

I didn't attempted to hijack the post. I'm not a provoker. I honestly expressed my opinion. That's it. 

Do you think I should only comment when I agree 100% with the author of the post? If so, I'm glad democracy doesn't depend on you.

RSS

Latest Activity

Dietrich Adonis updated their profile
15 minutes ago
Ben Pedersen replied to Tyler M.'s discussion Pick Your Poison
"I'm a fan of nearly any quality bourbon neat, preferably with a good cigar. My usual go-to combination is probably Basil Hayden's and a Man O' War Virtue. The Hayden's is decently sweet but acidic enough to wash the cigar off of…"
16 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to David F.'s discussion How to fast? One meal or two? in the group Catholic Men
""PREPARATION FOR LENT FAST AND ABSTINENCE: Everyone over 14 years of age is bound to observe abstinence (no meat). Abstinence is to be observed on all Fridays during Lent and Ash Wednesday. On Ash Wednesday and Good Friday, everyone between the…"
18 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Mongoose's discussion Where Do We Draw Limits of Gender Changing? in the group The Great Debate
""I'd say divide bathrooms along the physical body rather than the brain.You can enter whichever bathroom matches your plumbing (including after a surgery); seems like a simple solution." Does it seem that simple that this person…"
22 minutes ago
Ben Pedersen replied to Ben Pedersen's discussion Shooting Competitions
"Cowboy action shooting would be a blast! That's a someday thing for me since I don't own any single action guns. But thanks for the inspiration!"
28 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Sam K's discussion Should freedom of speech apply absolutely to the internet? in the group The Great Debate
"That's because modern politics are not just right-left; they are also up-down, where up represents authoritarianism and down represents anarchism and/or libertarianism (in the world-wide sense of the word; not the American sense of the word).…"
30 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Sam K's discussion Should freedom of speech apply absolutely to the internet? in the group The Great Debate
"This is a discussion about the current / internet age so I assumed we'd be using the current / internet age definitions and interpretations of the word anarchism. "
34 minutes ago
Mongoose posted a discussion
35 minutes ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service