So, I write a comment on the post about veterans today. Hit the "submit" button. See the "this comment is awaiting moderation" message. Then -- about 5 hours later-- my comment is still not there.

I didn't used bad words, nor did I write anything that I could regard as offensive to others.

So why was it censored? Because I don't agree with the author or the site owner?
I'm really upset about this. I don't think my opinion is any better than the next guy's, but I certanly do think it's JUST as important as his.

Has anybody had a similar issue in the past?

P.S. If you were about to write something like "well, it's Brett's blog, so if you don't like it just leave", please note that I do like the blog --a lot. But I also like virtues such as intelectual honesty, opennes and transparency.

Views: 1250

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've had it happen to me on many occaisions on a lot of sites....It's all about conformity....Sometimes your opinion just doesn't mesh with the general public's, you're not following the Sheeple.

 

I think it is very important to hear both sides of an argument....The opinion of men on both sides of the room.  But when the man on the other side of the room says something that goes against the mainstream and brings up issues people don't want to acknowledge, that man has to be silenced, because surely someone out of the masses will recognize this man is right, and then it spreads like a disease, and soon, there's a huge shift in thinking that the powers that be just cannot abide by as they feel threatened.

 

....I am NOT a right-wing lunatic, nor am I some weird conspiracy theorist...Just sayin....

It could be that Brett, or the other powers that be, simply haven't been around to approve the comment. Also I have noticed that Brett seems to try and avoid conflict in the main threads. This is why they have the Great Debate thread and such. So he may have felt that your comment, while not offensive in it self, may have cause the thread to become unruly.

To open a public forum and then avoiding conflict seems contradictory to me. I understand the need for moderation (avoiding spam and whatnot) but I'm positive my comment was rejected because of my point of view on celebrating war veterans.

Message Brett and ask him.  He's online now.

What was your comment?

Thanks for the heads up! I have just asked him.

Don't have a copy of the comment, but I wanted to say two things:

1) That I don't believe in honour people who kills other people

2) That not every war the US has fought had the purpose of preserving or achieving freedom

Yep. You probably got blocked.

Maybe Brett wanted his Veterans Day post, and it's comments section, to be about American Veterans rather than your petty European political gripes. I don't blame him for not letting you derail the comment section.

JB

I would argue that a great way to honor veterans is allow the exercise of the free speech that veterans protect.

I'm sure you would. But, this isn't a matter if free speech. It never was. AOM is not obligated to let somebody hijack it's comments section with a debate it'd rather not entertain at the moment.

JB

I feel like you're being hypocritical, JB. Calling Tomas petty while you yourself are. It's one thing to point out a man's errors. It's another thing to degrade his opinion in the process. 

I wouldn't want to denigrate your "feelings", but you're wrong.

To attempt to hijack a post meant to honor sacrifice, instead making it a debate about your personal non-American viewpoint on the American military is petty. Pointing out that it is petty is not similarly petty.

It is degrading, I suppose, but degrading and petty aren't the same thing. So, there's no hypocrisy.

JB

I'm an American and I don't think that there's anything wrong with non-Americans commenting on the meaning of Veterans' Day. It is also celebrated in many other places as Armistice Day!

I didn't attempted to hijack the post. I'm not a provoker. I honestly expressed my opinion. That's it. 

Do you think I should only comment when I agree 100% with the author of the post? If so, I'm glad democracy doesn't depend on you.

RSS

Latest Activity

Steve Dallas replied to Sir's discussion How far apart we are in the group The Great Debate
"Was thinking a little more on this, and as much as I hate to say it, might have to start taking the approach that they advise for brainstorming. Get together and focus only on finding where you have similarities. Don't allow the conversation to…"
6 minutes ago
Stephen Nelson updated their profile
24 minutes ago
Stephen Nelson posted a status
"If you are interested in reading books, check out the Art of Manliness Book Club, looking for participants."
28 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Beyond the blatant racism and sexism in this post; you're looking for an executive who "looks the part" while destroying the world?"
54 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"When you, Muir (singular, accusative YOU), begin a discussion with outright blatant lies easily disputed with a ten second Google search; how in depth of a discussion are you looking for beyond why you're beginning discussions with lies? So…"
59 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Forget the blacks, they might not turn out in huge numbers, but they are going to go for Hillary. What you need to worry about is women.  Also, when I compare him to the CEO of my company, it is night and day. Our CEO is a polished, refined…"
59 minutes ago
Native Son replied to floyd james's discussion What has happened to masculinity
"I call nonsense on this post. My experience with magazine subscriptions is that the renewal notices are harder to avoid than college alumni associations or PBS pledge drives. "
1 hour ago
John Muir replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Probably not. You're too oblique when you make your points. You throw out vague assertions or questions that imply something, and then when anyone replies with any granularity you say something like "that's not what I meant".…"
1 hour ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service