So, I write a comment on the post about veterans today. Hit the "submit" button. See the "this comment is awaiting moderation" message. Then -- about 5 hours later-- my comment is still not there.

I didn't used bad words, nor did I write anything that I could regard as offensive to others.

So why was it censored? Because I don't agree with the author or the site owner?
I'm really upset about this. I don't think my opinion is any better than the next guy's, but I certanly do think it's JUST as important as his.

Has anybody had a similar issue in the past?

P.S. If you were about to write something like "well, it's Brett's blog, so if you don't like it just leave", please note that I do like the blog --a lot. But I also like virtues such as intelectual honesty, opennes and transparency.

Views: 1146

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Point taken. 

I just went and looked through the comments.  There are a few in disagreement, and one exchange of disagreement, with the author.  So it's not an issue of disagreement, but rather your particular disagreement.  My opinion, it was just too inflammatory for that article.  Too political and too off topic.

Maybe you firmly believe 1 and 2. Okay, your business. But was it necessary to say it in a forum of honoring vets? Then complain if it's not posted by they guy that owns the blog? With free speech comes responsibility, and a right to free speech does not guarantee an adoring, simpering audience.

Can you really say you like intellectual honesty if your post on a veteran's day blog is intended to cause trouble? You were not being honest with yourself if you didn't think it through. Sometimes, a man must self-censor so as not to do harm.

Glad I typed all that coz my first reaction was nasty, but I self-censored as an example. Capisce?

To be fair, you have no legal right to post your comment on the article. Indeed, Brett reserves all rights to censor as much or as little as he wants. That's just the nitty gritty legal side of things.

I would agree with you that transparency (yeah, that buzzword) and the principle behind free speech should permit you to post your comment, especially if your comment was not vulgar, inflammatory, or otherwise offensive. Perhaps Brett just skipped over some comments and wasn't able to approve them all. Running this blog and being an active father would be a busy gig. Give him the benefit of the doubt. As you say, he runs a great site. I trust him in the comment sections as well. 

I know I don't have any "legal right" to post my comments (it's not like I wanna sue him!).  I actually agree with Brett in many aspects, but not with this.

It is a comment section on a private blog. You aren't being censored, you aren't having your honesty and "opennes" challenged, they aren't practicing a lack of transparency. Try using your virtue of being "intelectual" and realize that sometimes shit you say doesn't really matter and won't be put out there.

If you don't like it, you can always start your own blog and say whatever shit that you think needs to be said over there. Hell, say it in great debate or the blog feature here.

Either way, be a man and suck it up

LShieldes's got it.

Did you even read what I wrote up there? I will assume you didn't, so:

1) I don't think much of my opinion. It's as valuable as yours

2) I like AoM. It's my favorite blog. That doesn't mean I can't disagree with some aspects of it

By the way: next time you feel like being sarcastic, try harder.

Shieldes and I rarely agree, but we're of the same mind on this one.

 

You're not being censored.  Your comment was, apparently, found to be unworthy or unwelcome.  Frankly I'm curious what it said, but apparently I won't get to read it.

 

And, just for reference, I noticed no sarcasm in his reply to you.  

That's because he is lousy at it :D

I won't rewrite my comment, but I explained it's content to Shane in this thread.

I haven't read the comment sections on the main blog in a while, but I've never seen any comments censored for disagreement.  Simple or violent.  I didn't even know Brett was moderating them given some of the anti-AoM replies I've seen.  Also, given some of the disagreements I've had with Kate on this board, and me still being here, I'd be willing to bet it was an honest overlook.

I didn't know Kate waded into the forums. Never seen her here. 

RSS

Latest Activity

O'Neal posted a discussion

Is this negligence?

I've been working in a department store (Belk) inside of a mall for almost three years now. I've never had any security problems and I've always felt safe up until last Friday. I departed from school around 2:20 and I arrived at work at 2:40pm for my 3 o'clock shift. Belk employees have to park on the third floor of the parking deck which I've been doing. On this particular day, the deck was a bit fuller than usual due to the Easter weekend so I parked in the very back of the deck against the…See More
54 minutes ago
Aaron F Kendrick replied to Jack Neulist's discussion Finding the "Old Ones": Who really settled North America first? in the group History Buffs
"I can't remember if I have mentioned this before, but there is a book that lays the groundwork for such a question and it was by an author called Barry Fells.  He posited that there were many groups here in what we call the United States…"
1 hour ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Dave's discussion What's your favourite ad that inspires you to be a better man?
" "
1 hour ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Dave's discussion What's your favourite ad that inspires you to be a better man?
"Pavlov and Jung, not Freud, "
1 hour ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Brandon's discussion Admiring aspects of times of oppression
"There has been no era that the following era did not think was oppressive. 100 years from now, they'll think we are all backwards asshats, too. How exactly, is hard to discern. But asshats in their eyes, we will be.   I wouldn't…"
2 hours ago
Brandon posted a discussion

Admiring aspects of times of oppression

I was having a conversation with a woman today and I made a positive comparison to the style and composition of women in the Antebellum South. An African-American lady overheard me speaking and became extremely angry that I made a positive reference to a time when her ancestors were enslaved. I asked her if she thought the bubonic plague was the only thing going on before the European Renaissance, then I asked her if taxes would be the only reason an American would have stayed loyal to Britain…See More
2 hours ago
Adam Parker joined Ian McPhee's group
Thumbnail

The Manly Art of Baking.

A place for all the bakers out there. Come to discuss breads and the art of baking, e.g. things that have worked out or things that you just can't get to work. Open to the beginner and the artisan and everyone in between!
3 hours ago
Adam Parker joined Jeff Bates's group
Thumbnail

Manly Camping

A discussion place for all things camping...equipment, advice, cooking, tips, recommendations, etc.
3 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service