So, I write a comment on the post about veterans today. Hit the "submit" button. See the "this comment is awaiting moderation" message. Then -- about 5 hours later-- my comment is still not there.

I didn't used bad words, nor did I write anything that I could regard as offensive to others.

So why was it censored? Because I don't agree with the author or the site owner?
I'm really upset about this. I don't think my opinion is any better than the next guy's, but I certanly do think it's JUST as important as his.

Has anybody had a similar issue in the past?

P.S. If you were about to write something like "well, it's Brett's blog, so if you don't like it just leave", please note that I do like the blog --a lot. But I also like virtues such as intelectual honesty, opennes and transparency.

Views: 1250

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've had it happen to me on many occaisions on a lot of sites....It's all about conformity....Sometimes your opinion just doesn't mesh with the general public's, you're not following the Sheeple.

 

I think it is very important to hear both sides of an argument....The opinion of men on both sides of the room.  But when the man on the other side of the room says something that goes against the mainstream and brings up issues people don't want to acknowledge, that man has to be silenced, because surely someone out of the masses will recognize this man is right, and then it spreads like a disease, and soon, there's a huge shift in thinking that the powers that be just cannot abide by as they feel threatened.

 

....I am NOT a right-wing lunatic, nor am I some weird conspiracy theorist...Just sayin....

It could be that Brett, or the other powers that be, simply haven't been around to approve the comment. Also I have noticed that Brett seems to try and avoid conflict in the main threads. This is why they have the Great Debate thread and such. So he may have felt that your comment, while not offensive in it self, may have cause the thread to become unruly.

To open a public forum and then avoiding conflict seems contradictory to me. I understand the need for moderation (avoiding spam and whatnot) but I'm positive my comment was rejected because of my point of view on celebrating war veterans.

Thanks for the heads up! I have just asked him.

Don't have a copy of the comment, but I wanted to say two things:

1) That I don't believe in honour people who kills other people

2) That not every war the US has fought had the purpose of preserving or achieving freedom

Yep. You probably got blocked.

Maybe Brett wanted his Veterans Day post, and it's comments section, to be about American Veterans rather than your petty European political gripes. I don't blame him for not letting you derail the comment section.

JB

I would argue that a great way to honor veterans is allow the exercise of the free speech that veterans protect.

I'm sure you would. But, this isn't a matter if free speech. It never was. AOM is not obligated to let somebody hijack it's comments section with a debate it'd rather not entertain at the moment.

JB

I feel like you're being hypocritical, JB. Calling Tomas petty while you yourself are. It's one thing to point out a man's errors. It's another thing to degrade his opinion in the process. 

I wouldn't want to denigrate your "feelings", but you're wrong.

To attempt to hijack a post meant to honor sacrifice, instead making it a debate about your personal non-American viewpoint on the American military is petty. Pointing out that it is petty is not similarly petty.

It is degrading, I suppose, but degrading and petty aren't the same thing. So, there's no hypocrisy.

JB

I'm an American and I don't think that there's anything wrong with non-Americans commenting on the meaning of Veterans' Day. It is also celebrated in many other places as Armistice Day!

I didn't attempted to hijack the post. I'm not a provoker. I honestly expressed my opinion. That's it. 

Do you think I should only comment when I agree 100% with the author of the post? If so, I'm glad democracy doesn't depend on you.

You may not have intended to provoke, though I doubt it, but you would've. The thread would've become about you rather than them ... defeating the purpose.

Most of the time, provocation is fine. But, Veteran's Day isn't the time to put Veterans on the defensive.

Democracy is fine without your comment.

JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Poe Dameron replied to Salt Dragon's discussion Shirts vs. Skins? in the group The Shirtless Man
"Now the only way I'd play shirts vs skins is if I was on the skins team every single time"
6 hours ago
zak replied to Salt Dragon's discussion Shirts vs. Skins? in the group The Shirtless Man
"in high school my freshman yr the school went to new  reversible gym shirts one side blue the other yellow . when out side for gym it was blue vs yellow. i had my older brother shirt it was not reversible the coach said it ok to use some of the…"
6 hours ago
Poe Dameron posted a status
"Im gay. Been out for a few years and it feels great to admit it"
6 hours ago
Christopher McLaughlin left a comment for Drew
"Thanks for the add!!! Hope you are well!"
9 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Heath Edward O'Donnell's discussion Gaming and Proper Social Actions
"You answered your own question. Most subcultures don't mind noobs as long as they know they are noobs. I'm talking about the people who don't know they are noobs, or at least pretend to not know. The people who watch Rogue One and go…"
10 hours ago
David R. added a discussion to the group Stop me if you've heard this one
Thumbnail

Trojans

I have been tempted to buy a package of Trojan (super-size) condoms -- even though I certainly don't need them -- just to see the reaction of the clerk when I check out.  ;)See More
12 hours ago
Heath Edward O'Donnell replied to Heath Edward O'Donnell's discussion Gaming and Proper Social Actions
"Mainly comes when there is a change towards mainstream for the fandom. D&D took off hugely in the last 3 years thanks to Game of Thrones, Critical Role, and other shows that have vastly increased the number of people getting into the hobby. Same…"
14 hours ago
Sir replied to Heath Edward O'Donnell's discussion Gaming and Proper Social Actions
"I can't imagine excluding newbies.  Maybe there are others that find it natural."
14 hours ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service