So, I write a comment on the post about veterans today. Hit the "submit" button. See the "this comment is awaiting moderation" message. Then -- about 5 hours later-- my comment is still not there.

I didn't used bad words, nor did I write anything that I could regard as offensive to others.

So why was it censored? Because I don't agree with the author or the site owner?
I'm really upset about this. I don't think my opinion is any better than the next guy's, but I certanly do think it's JUST as important as his.

Has anybody had a similar issue in the past?

P.S. If you were about to write something like "well, it's Brett's blog, so if you don't like it just leave", please note that I do like the blog --a lot. But I also like virtues such as intelectual honesty, opennes and transparency.

Views: 1162

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've had it happen to me on many occaisions on a lot of sites....It's all about conformity....Sometimes your opinion just doesn't mesh with the general public's, you're not following the Sheeple.

 

I think it is very important to hear both sides of an argument....The opinion of men on both sides of the room.  But when the man on the other side of the room says something that goes against the mainstream and brings up issues people don't want to acknowledge, that man has to be silenced, because surely someone out of the masses will recognize this man is right, and then it spreads like a disease, and soon, there's a huge shift in thinking that the powers that be just cannot abide by as they feel threatened.

 

....I am NOT a right-wing lunatic, nor am I some weird conspiracy theorist...Just sayin....

It could be that Brett, or the other powers that be, simply haven't been around to approve the comment. Also I have noticed that Brett seems to try and avoid conflict in the main threads. This is why they have the Great Debate thread and such. So he may have felt that your comment, while not offensive in it self, may have cause the thread to become unruly.

To open a public forum and then avoiding conflict seems contradictory to me. I understand the need for moderation (avoiding spam and whatnot) but I'm positive my comment was rejected because of my point of view on celebrating war veterans.

Message Brett and ask him.  He's online now.

What was your comment?

Thanks for the heads up! I have just asked him.

Don't have a copy of the comment, but I wanted to say two things:

1) That I don't believe in honour people who kills other people

2) That not every war the US has fought had the purpose of preserving or achieving freedom

Yep. You probably got blocked.

Maybe Brett wanted his Veterans Day post, and it's comments section, to be about American Veterans rather than your petty European political gripes. I don't blame him for not letting you derail the comment section.

JB

I would argue that a great way to honor veterans is allow the exercise of the free speech that veterans protect.

I'm sure you would. But, this isn't a matter if free speech. It never was. AOM is not obligated to let somebody hijack it's comments section with a debate it'd rather not entertain at the moment.

JB

I feel like you're being hypocritical, JB. Calling Tomas petty while you yourself are. It's one thing to point out a man's errors. It's another thing to degrade his opinion in the process. 

I wouldn't want to denigrate your "feelings", but you're wrong.

To attempt to hijack a post meant to honor sacrifice, instead making it a debate about your personal non-American viewpoint on the American military is petty. Pointing out that it is petty is not similarly petty.

It is degrading, I suppose, but degrading and petty aren't the same thing. So, there's no hypocrisy.

JB

I'm an American and I don't think that there's anything wrong with non-Americans commenting on the meaning of Veterans' Day. It is also celebrated in many other places as Armistice Day!

I didn't attempted to hijack the post. I'm not a provoker. I honestly expressed my opinion. That's it. 

Do you think I should only comment when I agree 100% with the author of the post? If so, I'm glad democracy doesn't depend on you.

RSS

Latest Activity

Ryan James joined Jason M.'s group
Thumbnail

Concealed Carry Club

Every gentleman should be able to adequately protect himself and his family from ruffians’ intent on doing harm. This group welcomes anyone who takes pride in their second amendment right to keep and bear arms in a legally concealed manner.
12 minutes ago
Nathanael replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
""I mean we need to think deeper about ethics." You go first.  You like to talk a lot about ethics on this forum, but I've seen no evidence that you've actual engaged in any significant study of the field.  All you do…"
1 hour ago
Michael J. K. replied to Joe W's discussion Introductions in the group Fathers and Sons
"I am soon to be a grandpa again.  Due in one week,   Hope all is well with all of you.   Holding on to warm weather while it lasts.    I hope it does not snow until Dec. 15 in  time for Christmas."
1 hour ago
Charles Neill replied to Rusty Monson's discussion Freemasonry in 30 seconds in the group Freemasonry
"I can see where some Brothers have yet to find an organized religion that fits their beliefs ( it took me 40 years!), you can believe in a higher power without being a member of ... That being said, a true atheist inherently cannot value a man, as…"
1 hour ago
Travis Spuhler replied to Vytautas's discussion Favorite/Most Interesting Battle in the group Armchair Generals
"Funny you should mention that, as basically every modern historian has more than suggested that this is a myth. There simply isn't a reliable source from the period that ever suggests the practice of cutting off, or "showing off" the…"
1 hour ago
Matt posted a discussion

The art of doing and not thinking

Hi ThereSo first of all I want to explain - Obviously the title is a little incorrect when read literally. I'm well aware that most actions should have some thought behind them, and failure to think things through before doing them can lead to rash decisions and impulsive actions that may harbour undesirable consequences.I simply ask really, is there any method behind becoming a man of action.I know many of the articles on here touch on this in one way or another, but I'm curious to learn more.…See More
1 hour ago
Brad Williams replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
"Actually people do this all the time.  I assume you've never done cocaine and never will, but you should teach your children why it's a bad idea. I assume you've never lied to a woman to get her in bed and never would, and yet…"
1 hour ago
Brad Williams replied to Regular Joe's discussion To circumcise or not to circumcise . . .
"Jack called me a coward for not having kids.  He insulted me and assumed my reasons for living life as I please.  He is completely in the wrong.  I wanted to see if he was man enough to apologize. It's a strange world we live in…"
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service