IMO, motorcycles are pretty manly. Especially vintage motorcycles and/or crusiers. That said, even though this board is titled "Cars" I'm posting pics of my bike.

2005 Triumph Speedmaster

Made in England. Its only 865CC but can still haul ass.

Views: 443

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

nice bike. ya i think 800cc is more than enough as long as rider isn't a bigger guy. i have a 805cc suzuki intruder or vs800 as its sometiems called. it was my first bike learned on it not too big to learn on and still good enough or big enough to ride 5 years later. i kinda wish i woulda got a heavier model as mine has that classic cruisre look strippe down only weighs like 450lbs kinda wish i had another hundred or two pounds on the bike for windy days but you dont need a 1800cc bike for that weight. i had considered getting something bigger but for me 150lbs i cant imagine ever needing mroe than 800cc worth of power.

Don't laugh but I used to have a '67 Sears 106SS back in High School. Everybody else had Triumphs, Harleys, Yamahas and Hondas, but I had a Sears.   I lusted after a Norton 750 commando though.

Attachments:

Triumphs... there is just something about them. I almost bought a Speed Triple, such a nice machine. But didn't quite click with me. My current ride is the Ducati Streetfighter S. Absolutely brilliant machine!

Had a zx6r before that and cbr250rr as my first bike. Still love inline 4, but that L twin of Ducati just has so much attitude hehe.

Attachments:

Of course bikes are manly! Riding a bike that can go fast and being so exposed to anything that might go wrong, it's about balls... And balls are manly!

Very simplified of course, but yes riding a bike is manly. Its a dream of mine that will have to wait due to financials, but i'm sure I'm gonna get one in a few years!

RSS

Latest Activity

Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"an crap in the headlines, is Trump with his incessant idiotic tweeting about it. If he'd shut up about it, it'd be gone with in a week, but every morning the runs off a string of tweets about it, and the MSM talks about those all day."
3 minutes ago
Vendetta replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"If he sanctioned discussion on Russian meddling, he would be maligned for attacking freedom of speech and freedom of the press. I think most people know that the Russian collusion theory is pretty B.S., but people still talk about it. As long as…"
31 minutes ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"There's a double negative in there. I don't actually understand the question."
52 minutes ago
Sir replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Isn't complaining about something the opposite of sanctioning it?"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"What are you asking?"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"I was never afraid. It was a manufactured scandal from the beginning."
1 hour ago
Jay D replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Why does Trump complain about the Russian meddling in the election but does not sanction it?"
1 hour ago
Jay D replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Well nothing to fear then."
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service