Recently, Brett and Kate posted an article that put bitter and sweet, heartbreak and joy, and success and failure in the context of contrast. Inevitably this viewpoint was applied to good and evil, and subsequently, God.

I responded to the article thusly:

Many people have trouble dealing with extreme evil, pain, and suffering and therefore cannot fathom an omnipotent and yet loving God. However:

1. We have the knowledge of good and evil.
2. We have the ability to love others, and the need to be loved.
3. We have free will.

Imagine a line that goes from black and white, with shades of gray in between. (If you can't, search for "gray scale")
Now let black represent the most horrible evil you can imagine and white represent absolute good.
Let's say black is too evil, so God decides to get rid of it. Since we know the darkest gray is the most evil thing on the planet, we ask "Why does God allow dark gray?" never knowing that there was a black at all. You can eliminate the darker half of the scale, but that only gives us less options, it doesn't change the fact that know this gray(or action) is more evil than this gray. Even if we remove all but the lightest of grays, that gray will still become the darkest and most evil thing we know, thereby unacceptable, which brings us to the problem of whether or not to have one color or two and you cannot have free will without at least two options. I would not be surprised if there were evils blacker than black that God has seen fit to keep from us already...

...I have more to add, but am out of time for the moment, and will have to come back later.

Any comments? Qualms? Ideas?

Views: 143

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hey Evan.  Glad to see you chose to break out and explore some of these important and fascinating details that surfaced as a result of the Can't Have Sweet without the Bitter post.  I had to wait for my membership to get approved before I could comment.

I found the theist vs. atheist contrast that emerged very interesting.  There were many interesting comments.  The atheists seemed to be more 'militant' and contemptuous in their comments.  I don't know if that's a result of feeling outnumbered, or just arrogant. I like your philosophical take on the grey scale.  I agree that we can only judge good and bad in respect to what we're aware of as being the best and worst.  I've contemplated that issue of whether or not you can have the good without the bad before.  As one respondent said:  It sounds like what the Christians say heaven will be like.  And there is some truth to that.  But not in the way the character from the Twilight Zone episode experienced it.

I wrote a blog post entitled The Pain Benefit which is similar and explores the idea of how pain provides an opportunity for growth.  We don't like it, but it has a purpose.

That's at http://robdyson.blogspot.com/2011/09/pain-benefit.html .

I will have to think on this.  My sense now is that we think too small:  people might not complain that God is evil if he allowed occasional stomach upset, say -- or maybe we would! -- but He does seem to think bigger that the rest of us.  "Let me have my small life" -- "No, I want you to do more." Growing up is not easy.

I'd recommend green tea for that upset stomach. It's one of God's miracle drugs.

Here's some more info on it.http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/health-benefits-of-green... 

I forgot to mention: drink it without sugar, or even honey. You reap the health benefits by drinking it bitter which is ironic, isn't it, considering the thread topic.

RSS

Latest Activity

Josh Allen replied to Jack Bauer's discussion "Don't follow your passion" -- Mike Rowe
"I'm not going to con anyone, of course it will be enteraining to watch because its a show of hidden knowledge and a completely different way of looking at everyday things. I am currently writing a book on the holographic universe and how it…"
19 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Jack Bauer's discussion "Don't follow your passion" -- Mike Rowe
"I understand your fascination with Mr. Icke.   Easily swayed people are prone to fall for conspiracy theories.  Lizard people rule!!!!"
25 minutes ago
Peter Shields replied to John Gardiner's discussion Lost weigh and still wont take my shirt off in front of others in the group The Shirtless Man
"Well done. I am overweight now but until 27 was quite skinny to slim. Ironically back then I was shy as I wasn't stocky enough! Sometimes it's less about having confidence then having compassion for ourselves. Realising we are men and we…"
26 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to N. Vest's discussion Bug Out Bag,
"I understand your concern about community.  However, it being a 'bug-out' convo I slanted my responses toward that aspect of emergency reaction.  OTOH, if one is sheltering in place, bugging out to a particular community, or…"
30 minutes ago
Leto Atreides II replied to Jack Bauer's discussion "Don't follow your passion" -- Mike Rowe
"So you're aspiring to be a con man/entertainer. There's likely good money in that for as long as you can stay out of prison."
35 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Jack Bauer's discussion "Don't follow your passion" -- Mike Rowe
"I loved the episode of Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy show where he laughed at Icke and said that he was thankful for his wrestling career to be able to spot fakes"
42 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to Chris Hamm's discussion Who Wears a Watch Anymore?
"I wear one.  It's both a time-keeper and, for professional or dressy events, it's part of my attire.  In a professional setting, I find it more professional and subtle to glance at my watch than to pull out my cell to check the…"
42 minutes ago
Regular Joe replied to John Muir's discussion What do you keep in your trunk?
"You keep a tent from the 1700s in your trunk?"
47 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service