Recently, Brett and Kate posted an article that put bitter and sweet, heartbreak and joy, and success and failure in the context of contrast. Inevitably this viewpoint was applied to good and evil, and subsequently, God.

I responded to the article thusly:

Many people have trouble dealing with extreme evil, pain, and suffering and therefore cannot fathom an omnipotent and yet loving God. However:

1. We have the knowledge of good and evil.
2. We have the ability to love others, and the need to be loved.
3. We have free will.

Imagine a line that goes from black and white, with shades of gray in between. (If you can't, search for "gray scale")
Now let black represent the most horrible evil you can imagine and white represent absolute good.
Let's say black is too evil, so God decides to get rid of it. Since we know the darkest gray is the most evil thing on the planet, we ask "Why does God allow dark gray?" never knowing that there was a black at all. You can eliminate the darker half of the scale, but that only gives us less options, it doesn't change the fact that know this gray(or action) is more evil than this gray. Even if we remove all but the lightest of grays, that gray will still become the darkest and most evil thing we know, thereby unacceptable, which brings us to the problem of whether or not to have one color or two and you cannot have free will without at least two options. I would not be surprised if there were evils blacker than black that God has seen fit to keep from us already...

...I have more to add, but am out of time for the moment, and will have to come back later.

Any comments? Qualms? Ideas?

Views: 150

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hey Evan.  Glad to see you chose to break out and explore some of these important and fascinating details that surfaced as a result of the Can't Have Sweet without the Bitter post.  I had to wait for my membership to get approved before I could comment.

I found the theist vs. atheist contrast that emerged very interesting.  There were many interesting comments.  The atheists seemed to be more 'militant' and contemptuous in their comments.  I don't know if that's a result of feeling outnumbered, or just arrogant. I like your philosophical take on the grey scale.  I agree that we can only judge good and bad in respect to what we're aware of as being the best and worst.  I've contemplated that issue of whether or not you can have the good without the bad before.  As one respondent said:  It sounds like what the Christians say heaven will be like.  And there is some truth to that.  But not in the way the character from the Twilight Zone episode experienced it.

I wrote a blog post entitled The Pain Benefit which is similar and explores the idea of how pain provides an opportunity for growth.  We don't like it, but it has a purpose.

That's at http://robdyson.blogspot.com/2011/09/pain-benefit.html .

I will have to think on this.  My sense now is that we think too small:  people might not complain that God is evil if he allowed occasional stomach upset, say -- or maybe we would! -- but He does seem to think bigger that the rest of us.  "Let me have my small life" -- "No, I want you to do more." Growing up is not easy.

I'd recommend green tea for that upset stomach. It's one of God's miracle drugs.

Here's some more info on it.http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/health-benefits-of-green... 

I forgot to mention: drink it without sugar, or even honey. You reap the health benefits by drinking it bitter which is ironic, isn't it, considering the thread topic.

RSS

Latest Activity

Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Well that's not what I'm saying Shane so yeah...Whatever..."
29 minutes ago
Sir replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Your disagreement is clear.  And will not be resolved."
31 minutes ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"I'm saying human rights abuses are not the same as pulling money out of the wrong pot. Which you're saying."
35 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Saying both is fishy, is saying both is fishy.  It's not saying one is worse then the other.  I'm saying they are both fishy.  Stop trying to read into what I'm saying.  It's pretty cut and dry... Here…"
50 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Just pointing out...If Clinton's camp sends a whole bunch of young nice looking black men into a black neighborhood, she's going to look really good on that poll.  If she sends a bunch of people that look like they walked out of Duck…"
53 minutes ago
Profile IconIrfan Azim, Jdub Phx, Shane and 7 more joined Art of Manliness
1 hour ago
Carl Monster replied to GK's discussion Calling in sick to attend a job interview?
"Good point.  Telling them you HAVE to do something midweek, in the position he's in (they are not stupid, I'm sure they suspect he's unhappy) basically tell them he has an interview lined up, no matter how eager he is to make up…"
1 hour ago
jacksbuddy replied to Michael's discussion Has my Faith Made me Weak?
"I could not read your entire post.  I got too pissed off - - at you.  This has absolutely nothing to do with turning the other cheek. Period.  This also has nothing to do with fighting. Period.  You had a job that required you to…"
1 hour ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service