From what I understand, lifting lower weights for more reps builds more endurance, and lifting heavier weights with less reps builds more muscle. I'd like to have both. I was told that if you lift heavy weights for low reps with lots of sets and low times in between sets it grows muscle and endurance in a balanced manner. Is that true? Does anyone else have any tips? Having some muscle mass in addition to strength would be nice too, as I'm a pretty scrawny guy. 

Views: 775

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Why do you want muscular endurance? Are you a sports player? Or do you have any particular goals? If you're just looking to pack on some muscle then do StrongLifts or something similar. The endurance will handle itself later on.

Lots of people view muscular endurance like they do flexibility. Everyone says they should have it so they feel they need it. But you should really reflect what you need to do in life. If you are creaky and in pain do some more flexibility work. If you're puffed doing something you love or held back from some of your goals because of a lack of endurance work on it. If not, if strength and mass are your main goals, then find a program that leads you up to lifting heavy. 

The guys on here will be able to give you more exact recommendations of what but StrongLifts always looked like a good program to me. I don't lift weights (just do body weight stuff) so I'll hand over to the others now.

Squats and milk.

You forget deadlifts. I found squats great for leg and glute development, but for overall thickening, size and strength I found deadlifts to be King.

And they suck way more than squats, lol.

Are you doing high bar or low bar squats?  I like deads more than squats.  Less pressure on my body.  Squats and milk though, is a foundation program.  Supposed to be done for about six weeks only.  For thickening, size and strength; clean and press worked for me.

High bar.
I've been remiss in not learning the clean and press, but it's one exercise I feel I need someone to show me vs. just learn on Youtube. Just do the overhead press.

Thought you began with Starting Strength?

Wouldn't squats just improve your lower body? 

No, I'll point you to this article until one of the guys here who lifts gives you a more complete answer. Also remember, when that bar starts getting heavy holding it across your back and keeping good posture is going to start working pretty much everything. 

Liam's article hit it. Pretty much the only muscle groups not directly touched by squats are chest and grip. And, as the article states in point one, they'll be hit indirectly, especially once you go heavy. Squats are a true full body exercise.

If you go to www.stronglifts.com on the left you can put in your name and email and get a book that goes through the entire program and explains the lifts, has success stories, etc. I'd suggest getting it, reading it and seeing if it is something that fits your goals. 

I've seen a lot of stuff in Men's Health that talks about designing programs around activities done during manual labor. Axe, sledge hammer, I know shoveling works pretty well, so does roofing. That kind of stuff will satisfy stronger/more endurance. Actually working hard will make you eat more and eating more will put on weight. As long as you consume more calories than you burn. I'm not very big either. . .but two of me can move an upright piano and then go do something else the rest of the day. Some of the "big guys" move the piano and their done for. . . more than size. . . you may not have the right fast/slow twitch muscle balance to get big. . . but you can turn it into steel. . . look at Bruce Lee.

Some what shameless plug, but the mace, club, and kettle bell are great ways to build strenght and endurance. The jury is still out on mass.

 

We've got a group here on AoM(Old School Iron Group) with some good link/info on them.

RSS

Latest Activity

Nick H replied to Mongoose's discussion Equal Access to Education for Job Preparedness
"I thought the USA already had the world's largest publicly funded vocational school via the USA military. Also, if we don't use grades (and financial need) to decide who gets grants then what benchmarks would you propose that would be fair?"
2 hours ago
Nick H replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"If you mean for a patient's perspective I wouldn't know since I've only experienced Ireland's and Canada's system. Although from there I could give my opinion about comparing Ireland's mixed public/private system to…"
2 hours ago
Nick H replied to Joshua's discussion Democratic presidential nomination in the group The Great Debate
"That I didn't know so thank you for the info"
3 hours ago
Penelope replied to Mongoose's discussion Equal Access to Education for Job Preparedness
"So, you want all the forms of financial aid that are available for, say, medical school, to also be available for, say, beauty school? I think financial aid is available for beauty school, even government aid. Germany has a program where…"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Moe Kanz's discussion Long hair gents...
"When you post something on a forum, it's fair game for commentary and questions."
4 hours ago
manInTheMaking replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"we will have to agree to disagree. "
4 hours ago
Michael D. Denny replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Incorrect. When your intent is to end the life of an innocent human being whose single and only crime is that of existing, that is malicious intent. Thus, it is murder. It is black and white."
4 hours ago
John White posted a status
"better to be hated for what you are, than loved for what you are not."
5 hours ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service