Building a professional wardrobe from the (almost) ground up

Hello manly men,

I am trying to build a wardrobe from almost scratch. I have recently been hired as an intern with a department of my state. I'll have this job for the next year and a half (unless I hate it or they hate me) until I graduate with my bachelor's in Civil Engineering. At that point my goal is to be offered a full-time position in the department as an engineer, or at least come out of it with a really good reference.

When I had my interview the dress at the office seemed to be business casual or maybe even casual business. However I think that they were impressed with the fact that I wore a suit and I think that if I want to be an engineer I should dress like some of the PEs I know. Also I think that it's easier to "dress down" than it is to "dress up" so I should acquire a nice wardrobe now.

I was wondering if you knowledgeable folks might help me with my "shopping list" and offer some advice? 

Basically, what I have right now is one black suit, two pair each dress socks in blue black and brown, one dress shirt and two or three good ties. For shoes I have a pair of shiny cheap cap-toe dress shoes and a pair of black Doc Martens shoes. My dad said he is going to send me two sports coats, that should fit me well, so I should have the jacket covered unless they are like super-1970's funky. 

I'm hoping to hit the town Sunday and flesh out my wardrobe. Here's what I'm shooting for:

- A wool pea coat/trench coat (it's Alaska and it'll be winter for another 3 months)

- A scarf

- Two or three cool ties

- Tie bar

- Three or four more dress shirts

- Three pairs of pants (black, blue and khaki)

Is there anything I'm missing? Any suggestions on where to get this stuff on a student budget? Should I pick up another pair of shoes? Am I on the right track or is this too dressy?

Views: 731

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

No offense taken.  The later surplus coats are good, the Schotts are phenomenal.  Schott had Navy contracts to produce Peas before the specs changed.  The story goes that Schott decided to keep the coat the same even though the quality/material specs were loosened.  Of course other contractors were able to bid lower and that ended the military deal.

I really respect Schott for keeping their standards up.  If the OP was in San Diego or the Deep South it probably would not matter.  But in Alaska I'd go with the Schott, no question.

I've had my Schott classic pea for decades.  It's a coat that can be passed down through the generations.

RSS

Latest Activity

Barry Bailey commented on Omar Cabaleiro's group Naturopathic Healing
"Chad, tell me more about the "nerve Glides" you are using. I'm not familiar with that term or what it is. I am a Massage Therapist and also don't us the OTC and Rx meds. I've had sinus issues for years and the med the…"
15 minutes ago
Shane replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Depends if it's a casual conversation or not.  I tend to try and not ask for sources unless I can't find them myself.  I think the big problem is echo chambers."
21 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"That's the same information I found too Shane. I do find it odd that the anti's are spouting all these statistics, and not listing sources.  Always thought in a debate you were supposed to be prepared support your own position.…"
27 minutes ago
Shane replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
32 minutes ago
Michael replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Dallas, I believe you are being disingenuous. Instead of making I us play a guessing game, please tell us. What proof do you need? What will it take for you to abandon your position? What in your opinion is irrefutable evidence?"
44 minutes ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Either one of you going to list your source? "
45 minutes ago
Michael replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Michael J.K. the existence of other problems did not negate the existence of the problem at hand, namely abortion. In your line of reasoning, nothing is worth argument if there is supposedly something worse."
53 minutes ago
Michael replied to Todd Serveto's discussion Revolting, Macabre Details About Planned Parenthood's Gruesome Barbarism--Where Are The Excuses? in the group The Great Debate
"Sir is quite correct. By their own reports, more than ninety-four percent of their services are abortions. That puts Planned Parenthood squarely in the abortion business, not the healthcare business. You have offered a false premise."
56 minutes ago

© 2015   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service