I have a need to appear less shrimpy. I have muscles to a decent degree and can fake my way through a few chin-ups, but my arms and legs are terribly skinny.

Can anyone recommend a decent workout that emphasizes forearm and calf strength?

Tags: beefing, up, workout

Views: 717

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Adonis Index is a body sculpting program which will give you beach muscles.

I saw the Adonis Index once but it seemed fishy to me so I stayed away. I'm assuming you embraced it though. Does it actually work?

It works, but like I said it's a sculpting program, not a strength program.  If the OP only wants to bulk up and gain massive strength then do StrongLifts 5x5 or Starting Strength and get on the GOMAD program.

I don't know if Starting Strength is a good program for "I need to be a certain way by a certain date". It strikes me to be more of a longer term thing, even though it is very effective.

Just not the program you see guys holding newspapers over their newly chiseled physiques.

I agree, but when it comes to time, 12 week programs are 12 week programs.  SL5x5 is a beginner powerlifting routine.  SS lays out the lifts and I'd recommend that book even if deciding on SL for the routine.  For sheer mass and strength you can't go wrong with a powerlifting program to start. 

My suggestion is, build  your foundation, then carve out the body you want.  All those chiseled guys are basically using a competition routine to make muscle show off, but they have muscle to start.  If you look at Strong Man or Olympic powerlifting competitors, they're not chiseled.  But, they'll outpush the chiseled guys.

There's also the "beginner's effect" which will cause gains to show no matter what you do, when you're a beginner.  Whatever routine you pick as a beginner will show improvements.  Until you stop showing improvements.  Then you need to reset, build that base again, and then start shaping again.

I posted my thoughts on AI as a sculpting program, before I saw the OPs pic.  He doesn't have much to sculpt.  Might want to start building it first if he has a certain look in mind.  But then, beginner's effect.  So whatever.  It doesn't matter what you do as a beginner, it will show.  Just know the limitations of the routines you choose.

I keep SS at my bedside, but I wonder if such a book would turn off a newbie, especially someone with a non-athletic background. I know it probably would have turned me off. It was written for coaches and is full of jargon and scary-looking anatomical illustrations. 

I liked the Ellis program because it used both free weights and machines. I could slowly get used to learning the basic free weight movements while also being able to hit the safer and no brainer machines hard.

It was the anatomical illustrations which drew me to it....

Ok, new recommendation.  Convict Conditioning and P90X.  Convict Conditioning will provide you pull up alternatives to P90X's pull up routines (which are shit for beginners); and P90X is a good, regimented, beginner, strength workout which can be done with very minimal equipment and no weights at all.

Funny, everyone is different.

Good recommendation.

A whole chapter on deadlift technique can be a turnoff to someone who's never lifted a weight before.

What's to know?  Pick it up, put it down.  That's why I like SL, start with an empty bar.  I like the coaching in SS, which is why I recommend it no matter what you choose.  I'd always been told to lift my eyes and look at where the wall meets the ceiling opposite the room in order to keep your back from rounding.  The coaching, from actual coaches, to look lower, was new to me.

Same with squats, on the head angle. 

Yes, an excellent book.

Anthony Ellis has a good program for ectos like us. I started on it and it was the first time I really saw results with any speed.
It will kick your ass if you do it right, and back it up with lots of good food and rest.
For me it was the intro to some decent weight gain.

Forearms and calves, really?  Not chest?  You're not going to end up looking like Popeye, are you?

Books I read said:  work out all over, so you don't end up with (say) huge forearms and small biceps.

RSS

Latest Activity

Herb Munson replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
"For some schools, that might be a good prayer to pray ... on several levels."
49 minutes ago
Daniel replied to Herb Munson's discussion The Primacy and Existence of God in the group The Great Debate
"She must have been praying for the tornado to rip apart her school."
1 hour ago
Mike Copperman replied to Matt L.'s discussion Mix and match vests
"The last three pairs are good to go. I would not wear the first combination. They are too similar, but not identical."
1 hour ago
Dallas the Phallus replied to Silas Moser's discussion Fun new words... in the group Philology: A Group for Verbivores
"landlubber - noun an unseasoned sailor or someone unfamiliar with the sea. Etymology landlubber (n.) also land-lubber, sailor's term of contempt for a landsman, c.1700, from land (n.) + lubber…"
1 hour ago
Aaron Lancaster replied to John Muir's discussion Night Photography in the group AoM PhotoGroup
"Cheers Ian The ISO depends on how dark it is, the aperture and what you want to achieve. I generally go as low as possible to reduce noise in the image. The above images are; 1. ISO 200 2. ISO 400 3. ISO 3200 This one is an ISO 200 taken at f18…"
1 hour ago
Chuck Knight replied to Daniel's discussion Casual Belts for Jeans?
"Just as you loosely match the colors, brown for brown, etc...you loosely match the metals as well.   Many casual belts will have snaps which allow you to easily change the buckle, so you can change the buckle's metal and design depending…"
1 hour ago
Will replied to LShieldes's discussion Scandal run down in the group The Great Debate
"I think y'all have more faith in the legal system than I do -- and I have more than she does.  A year in prison?  She'll have biweekly interviews so the media can regularly report on how cruel Congress is to a sweet lady who was…"
2 hours ago
Michael replied to Nathan DeParis's discussion Women: The Infallible Baromoter
"It's humor. And if you wanted to take it seriously you missed the point."
2 hours ago

© 2013   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service