Hey guys,

The house I bought has 5 or 6 Energey EAS-6C speakers and 1 Yamaha NS-IW360C speaker integrated into the ceilings of various rooms. All the speaker cables peek out at one particular spot where I can connect an amp / receiver. 

My in-laws lent me an old Technics amp / receiver but it didn't have enough space for all the speaker wires. Even when I tried it with just a few speakers plugged in, the sound faded in and out and was often fuzzy. The speakers are brand new and have otherwise never been used so I suspect that the amp / receiver is just busted. (The amp is probably 30-40 years old.)

So what I'd like to know is what kind of amp / receiver do I need to make this work? I don't want anything fancy and, in all likeliness, the only thing we'll ever connect to the receiver is our cellphones or laptops to stream music.

Since that's the case, can you make some recommendations? Or at least give me an idea of what kind of specs or features I can look for?

Thanks!

Views: 32

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It sounds like it's set up for either a 5.1 or 7.1 system (surround sound - 5.1 is most common). So I would be looking for a specific A/V receiver to do that. Budget options I recommend would come from Yamaha and Denon. Next tier up is NAD then Marantz. 

Tl;dr: Any reciver that supports 5 or 6 speakers at 8ohm should be ok.

Btw, Yamaha recalled that speaker: http://usa.yamaha.com/support/warranty/audio_visual/safety_recall/n...

Do you have any idea how are speakers connected? I'm asking because if you have 4ohm stable reciver you can connect two speakers in parallel, so they play louder. Also you could connect more speakers to same output if you combine speakers with parallel and/or series.

Also that yamaha speaker is 6ohm, and EAS are 8ohm, this could be a bit of a problem. Yamaha should play louder than the rest because of this and could result in short and/or overheating if reciver has problems with lower than 8ohm.

RSS

Latest Activity

Vendetta replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"If he sanctioned discussion on Russian meddling, he would be maligned for attacking freedom of speech and freedom of the press. I think most people know that the Russian collusion theory is pretty B.S., but people still talk about it. As long as…"
22 minutes ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"There's a double negative in there. I don't actually understand the question."
43 minutes ago
Sir replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Isn't complaining about something the opposite of sanctioning it?"
54 minutes ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"What are you asking?"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"I was never afraid. It was a manufactured scandal from the beginning."
1 hour ago
Jay D replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Why does Trump complain about the Russian meddling in the election but does not sanction it?"
1 hour ago
Jay D replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
"Well nothing to fear then."
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Dominic's discussion Trump, Flynn, Russians - oh my! in the group The Great Debate
""May have" "Appears to" Do these bullshit phrases have a German equivalent? Because in English, they mean, "I'm making shit up". Flynn has been cleared of Russia, they're investigating ties to Turkey now."
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service