I recently was shown this article.  Honestly made me feel pretty sad.

http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=18-07-021-f

Personally, I feel like I've been a very guarded person most of my life yet I've also really craved some kind of deep friendship (or buddyship) with another man.  The fear and risk of sexualizing it has definitely kept me far away from something I really want.

Just wanted to share.  What do you all think about the article?

Views: 1860

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'd say; if you want to be friends with a man, be friends with him.  If you don't want to have sex with him, it's probably best you didn't.

Unless it's Thursday... then go ahead and do it anyway. 

Ahhh, yes.  Manlove Thursday.

Jesus Shane, you are deep and wise. Glad you're here with us!

You think he should have sex with a man he doesn't want to?

What is this about Thursday,  I've heard that before.

Not being Sarcastic at all, have read many of your posts including Manlove Thursday - I just wanted you to know that I enjoy your posts and understand your logic...that might scare you but so be it. 

I'm being serious, what is it about Thursday (I never heard of Manlove Thursday until the post above)?  But I've heard this reference made before, someone told me a long time ago that in a dormitory (I won't say where) in the 1950s if you didn't want to have sex you kept your door locked on Thursday nights.  What's the significance of Thursday, and why would I be scared by your comment?

***** deep friendship (or buddyship) with another man. The fear and risk of sexualizing it *****

There might be fear of sexualizing it, but no significant risk if you're not sexually attracted to other men in the first place. Contrary to Freudian theories of bisexuality, most people of both sexes prefer one or the other, and are not indifferent. Heterosexuals have innate sexual instincts that make them feel uncomfortable going past certain boundaries.

The fear has more to do with what's called a psychologial taboo, rather than a real risk. Seemingly masculine men in pre-civilized societies, or for that matter in agrarian backwaters, tend to be fairly affectionate with their friends, because they don't have the taboo because they're not conscious of the possibility of homosexuality in the first place. The taboo arises because many people are confused about the nature of homosexuality.

Think in terms of men and children: Many fathers are quite affectionate with their children, and it is precisely the more affectionate, protective types that are LESS likely to have sexual relationships with their own offspring. His very protective instincts would make him all the less likely to do anything that he would think would harm them. Also, interestingly, more masculine men tend to be more affectionate with their children, including sons, than "metrosexuals". It actually makes sense if you think about it.

Despite this fact, many women who watch too much Oprah/read "Dear Abby", etc, assume that all men are child molesters. ("Men are incapable of love; all they want is sex"...) It is actually a fairly common belief that children should not be left alone with a man. Recently a stewardess on an airplane moved two children away from a man, and reassigned them to sit next to a woman, pointedly claiming "for their safety". He reported being insulted and humiliated by the suggestion.

When I was younger I had strong taboos against touching. It's probably imprinted; my parents were not affectionate with me. Now I regularly hug on parting, and also on greeting if we haven't seen each other in a while, and I pat on shoulders and backs both paying compliments and also when gently ribbing. I think this is generally acceptable, and it stimulates warm, friendly feelings (the hormone oxytocin), not sexual feelings (the hormone testosterone). What is appropriate can depend on circumstances. In the case of Frodo and Sam, Frodo was injured. But if he didn't need comforting, it would have been awkward.

I think verbal affection is important. Make your friends feel good about themselves, and cared for. Give them lots of encouragement. You'll find that done appropriately, they'll tend to respond well to this, because like most people they're hungry for approval and have some self-esteem issues. Oddly, this is probably harder for most men than overcoming taboos against physical affection: our speech centers and emotional centers are reputedly wired on different hemispheres of our brains! However after a while, you can train yourself to freely say something thoughtful, classy, and appropriate for the situation, that makes your friends feel good.

^ Right, that's what I said.

BWAHAHAHA

Nice!

RSS

Latest Activity

george morgan replied to AdamInTrans's discussion Accountability Group
"Count me in; I think it is a great idea. "
2 minutes ago
Edward Warden commented on Carlos Lemus's group Book Group
"Just finished another Grisham book, "Gray Mountain." I didn't like it as much as I liked "Rouge Lawyer." The most notable thing is a shock midway through, but the ending is kind of abrupt."
10 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Putin, and meme toters."
10 hours ago
R. Max replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"It's not hard, the dude looks like a skeevy insurance sales man that talks about how he went hunting all the time when he was 12. Also his name is Vlad. "
10 hours ago
Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"Oh it was brilliant. She blamed everything on Putin."
12 hours ago
Native Son replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
"I don't pay much attention to stump speeches, always believing that when the candidate's lips are moving, it's lies and exaggerations."
14 hours ago
Daniel replied to James's discussion When can a kid pick his own damn hairstyle?!
"Having a hair nazi parent is not one of those things you look back on as an adult and appreciate, because it's less about the job of raising a good human, and more about Mom's image. The kid knows that, and will remember that."
15 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion General Election 2016 in the group The Great Debate
17 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service