I recently was shown this article.  Honestly made me feel pretty sad.

http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=18-07-021-f

Personally, I feel like I've been a very guarded person most of my life yet I've also really craved some kind of deep friendship (or buddyship) with another man.  The fear and risk of sexualizing it has definitely kept me far away from something I really want.

Just wanted to share.  What do you all think about the article?

Views: 1853

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'd say; if you want to be friends with a man, be friends with him.  If you don't want to have sex with him, it's probably best you didn't.

Unless it's Thursday... then go ahead and do it anyway. 

Ahhh, yes.  Manlove Thursday.

Jesus Shane, you are deep and wise. Glad you're here with us!

You think he should have sex with a man he doesn't want to?

What is this about Thursday,  I've heard that before.

Not being Sarcastic at all, have read many of your posts including Manlove Thursday - I just wanted you to know that I enjoy your posts and understand your logic...that might scare you but so be it. 

I'm being serious, what is it about Thursday (I never heard of Manlove Thursday until the post above)?  But I've heard this reference made before, someone told me a long time ago that in a dormitory (I won't say where) in the 1950s if you didn't want to have sex you kept your door locked on Thursday nights.  What's the significance of Thursday, and why would I be scared by your comment?

***** deep friendship (or buddyship) with another man. The fear and risk of sexualizing it *****

There might be fear of sexualizing it, but no significant risk if you're not sexually attracted to other men in the first place. Contrary to Freudian theories of bisexuality, most people of both sexes prefer one or the other, and are not indifferent. Heterosexuals have innate sexual instincts that make them feel uncomfortable going past certain boundaries.

The fear has more to do with what's called a psychologial taboo, rather than a real risk. Seemingly masculine men in pre-civilized societies, or for that matter in agrarian backwaters, tend to be fairly affectionate with their friends, because they don't have the taboo because they're not conscious of the possibility of homosexuality in the first place. The taboo arises because many people are confused about the nature of homosexuality.

Think in terms of men and children: Many fathers are quite affectionate with their children, and it is precisely the more affectionate, protective types that are LESS likely to have sexual relationships with their own offspring. His very protective instincts would make him all the less likely to do anything that he would think would harm them. Also, interestingly, more masculine men tend to be more affectionate with their children, including sons, than "metrosexuals". It actually makes sense if you think about it.

Despite this fact, many women who watch too much Oprah/read "Dear Abby", etc, assume that all men are child molesters. ("Men are incapable of love; all they want is sex"...) It is actually a fairly common belief that children should not be left alone with a man. Recently a stewardess on an airplane moved two children away from a man, and reassigned them to sit next to a woman, pointedly claiming "for their safety". He reported being insulted and humiliated by the suggestion.

When I was younger I had strong taboos against touching. It's probably imprinted; my parents were not affectionate with me. Now I regularly hug on parting, and also on greeting if we haven't seen each other in a while, and I pat on shoulders and backs both paying compliments and also when gently ribbing. I think this is generally acceptable, and it stimulates warm, friendly feelings (the hormone oxytocin), not sexual feelings (the hormone testosterone). What is appropriate can depend on circumstances. In the case of Frodo and Sam, Frodo was injured. But if he didn't need comforting, it would have been awkward.

I think verbal affection is important. Make your friends feel good about themselves, and cared for. Give them lots of encouragement. You'll find that done appropriately, they'll tend to respond well to this, because like most people they're hungry for approval and have some self-esteem issues. Oddly, this is probably harder for most men than overcoming taboos against physical affection: our speech centers and emotional centers are reputedly wired on different hemispheres of our brains! However after a while, you can train yourself to freely say something thoughtful, classy, and appropriate for the situation, that makes your friends feel good.

^ Right, that's what I said.

BWAHAHAHA

Nice!

RSS

Latest Activity

Joseph Oldman Moore replied to Pale Horse's discussion Black Hebrew Israelites and GOCC in the group Christian Men
"It's better to ignore these buffoons, they are just a very loud small cult."
33 minutes ago
Jort replied to David R.'s discussion Answered prayers in the group Christian Men
"Someone once taught us: "A couple that prays together stays together.". And it worked so far. That aside, we had prayers answered before when we gave our situation up in prayer. Mostly simple needs as food and clothing, when our kids were…"
3 hours ago
Nick H replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"Are you talking about cloning (life from only one of two sets of gametes)? I think if we overthink what is life, sin, etc we miss the point. Where does your father stand on identical twins? They came from one fertilised egg split after conception.…"
3 hours ago
John Bravo posted a discussion

What does the AoM communtiy think about one night stands?

Had my first one with a girl I met at a bar the other night...Always been a LTR kinda guy and I'm not sure if I've just become jaded or lost my morals here or what.See More
5 hours ago
leadership posted a discussion

Meeting a girl online: A good introduction message

The introduction message which you send to that cute girl online in which you attempt to cultivate a relationship with her is supposed to be the "attention getter", that determines whether she will message you back and continue the conversation, or just move on hoping to find a better man.I have been using online dating services for over a year now, as a second method in my arsenal NOT as a substitute to meeting a girl offline in the "real world". I have no problems talking to women and asking…See More
5 hours ago
Pale Horse added a discussion to the group Christian Men
Thumbnail

Black Hebrew Israelites and GOCC

Just now heard of them. Apparently one of their ministers went head to head against apologist James White. Smells like heresy. What is it and is it heretical?
6 hours ago
jazzgirl205 replied to Persona non Grata's discussion Men who whine about women?
"I hear this from both women and men.  The problem is not in their stars, dear Brutus, but in themselves.  These whiners are usually not attracted to decent human beings.  They always seem to be drawn to troubled people. …"
8 hours ago
Kevin Morris replied to David R.'s discussion Answered prayers in the group Christian Men
"Good analysis David.  There have been times when I have thought how wonderful it was that God said "no" to something.  He cares for each of us and we have to entrust that He knows what is best.  We may not understand why…"
9 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service