Well, Iv thought pretty much for 2 years now and i honestly want to join the Army reserves or national guard. The only problem is with me being 17 and in high school its hard to convince my mom to let me enter the reserves now so i could start now and continue up through college so i can come out an officer. I've told her this and my dad for the past few months hoping that it would work in convincing them but its just poop, there really adamant about be not entering, ill be 18 soon this Dec. and i can enter with out consent but I really don't want to have bad blood going on with them. Can someone give  e any advise on the matter?

Views: 223

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If you are wanting to go officer, it would be wiser to try to enroll into ROTC. You won't actually be in the Army until you graduate and are commissioned, and it won't interfere with your education (would actually complement it). And they pay for your college.

Yea I am also planning to do ROTC in college, the thing is that I kinda wanted to do Reserve now so i could some pay and do all of that while getting my officer training you something kinda like getting the experience

That's not quite how it works.  You can't just switch from enlisted to officer corps.

Yeah, you gotta pick one or the other. I'd suggest talking to an Army officer recruiter and let him explain the details of how ROTC works

Not true. There are a few programs that allow enlisted members to get their commission. You can be in the guard and also in rotc at the same time. It is called The Simultaneous Membership Program. Having already completed basic and AIT will give you an edge over other students and you will most likely be put in a leadership role...helping you learn to lead soldiers. Also, you can stay in the reserves the whole time you are in college, getting free tuition, and then decide to go OCS after you get your degree. Being enlisted prior to commissioned is a great way to learn and be able to put yourself in an enlisted soldier's shoes. 

I stand corrected.

Just looked it up.  It's not the same as he's talking about.  The Simultaneous Membership Program looks like it isn't for enlisted personnel, it's for ROTC cadets to get some training in while still ROTC., but you'd still be acting in an officer billet as a trainee.  The Green-to-Gold program is for enlisted to commission.  DoD doesn't have a direct path from enlisted to officer corps.

That's what I thought, but I'm neither a reservist or guardsman, so I don't know the nuances of those realms.

Reservists are the same.  Except they need to serve six years before dropping to the IIR.

"The purpose of the SMP Program is to: (1) give eligible enlisted members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve an opportunity to participate in the Advanced ROTC Program" 

I was a member of SMP so I know what I am talking about. I was a guard member who then enrolled in college and entered the ROTC program while still serving as a member of the guard. As for DoD not having a direct path from enlisted to officer corps, have you not heard of OCS?

"Officer candidates are drawn from enlisted members (up to SFC), warrant officers, inter-service transfers,or civilian college graduates who enlist for guaranteed attendance at OCS after they complete basic training"

Any enlisted member who has a college degree (or a certain number of  credit hours and is working towards the degree) and meets age and security requirements can enroll in OCS. About as direct as you can get

News to me.  Everyone was always trying to push the long way around.  As for SMP, what I read didn't say anything about enlisted.  I know jack and shit about the Army.

If you're gonna go enlisted, you will stay enlisted until the end of your contract. That's just way too roundabout of a way, when you could just join ROTC, still go to the field, still do all the super hooah army stuff, and get commissioned at the end of your four years. ROTC isnt just an extracurricular activity, its an actual contract with the army.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"I used to live where we still had party lines. Not only would I be calling her whole house, but also two or three of her neighbor's houses as well."
1 hour ago
Jack Bauer replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"For what it's worth, God gave us the ability to figure out how to do all kinds of things that are wrong.  That we discovered the ability to do it doesn't necessarily mean it isn't "automatically wrong". To answer the…"
1 hour ago
Robin Holmström replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"I was hoping she did but no. I don't even think it should matter, it's still me asking her out no matter how I do it. Wish I could've known. So there's 0 chance now? Calling her after getting a no through text probably won't…"
2 hours ago
Steve Dallas replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"Sounds like you and your dad need to listen to your Johnny Cash singing about his Cadillac My view on the whole thing though is that if God gave us the ability to figure this stuff out, then it can't automatically be wrong. For a discussion…"
3 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"In that case I share your beliefs and concerns.  As I too would worry about that being, being an empty shell.  I see no way that a truly "artificial being" could possess a soul, and that is truly what worries me more than just…"
3 hours ago
Steve Dallas replied to Robin Holmström's discussion Tarzan flick as date?
"If she doesn't want to answer, she won't. If she wants to talk to you, she will pick up. That takes care of calling or not. Remember, a big chunk of us grew up when you would call the entire house just to speak with her. So calling her…"
3 hours ago
Pale Horse replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"I mean making life without one or the other, in a lab. I know it is already being done to an extent."
3 hours ago
Clinton R. Ausmus replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Nature of Life and Conception in the group The Great Debate
"You can still start with an egg and a sperm and grow a being in a lab.  Is that what you're considering man made, or because it started as two parts (sperm and egg), is it not man made?  What constitutes "Man Made"…"
3 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service