http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/schwarzenegger-your-he-man-da...

 

  This whole article is godawful, and the smug, judgemental manner in which the author spins it up is probably the worst thing about it.  It's not so much an attack on Schwarzenegger as it is a derogatory condemnation of traditional male culture in general. In the past I've enjoyed the LA times Hero Complex blog, but I'm going to bypass it completely in the future.

   There are a couple good points about societal "progress", but they are lost in the quagmire of vicious man-hating, feminizing  rubbish.  Let me know if this gets your hackles up like it does mine!

                                                                                                      Sam

Views: 1046

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Meh, overall I agree with the point of the article, could have used a better author that didn't ramble as much and could do a clearer job of defining her modern man as well as her he-man though.

  I believe if looked at a bit more objectively, the basis for musclehead action heroes being a thing of the past would hold true.  What I thought was an ironic character example usage was the mention of Robert Downey Jr.'s Holmes.  While, at least in my opinion, he is actually closer to the incredibly capable Holmes of the books, fans of the older Sherlock movies have accused him of making Holmes into a "cheesy action hero".

  

I think she was talking about Robert Downey's Tony Stark -- smartass inventor superhero -- not Sherlock Holmes.

 

Still ... the point doesn't really make sense when he's accompanied by Thor, almost literally He-Man, and Captain America, an obvious callback to "old guard masculinity".  Or mirrored by Batman's gigantic franchise, and Superman coming soon.  Or The Expendables.  Etc.  Die Hard just had another movie.  There's a Gerard Butler thing coming out this week that looks like Die Hard in the White House.


Scwarzennegger's heyday is over, but I think that has more to do with him than the death of the traditionally masculine action hero.

 

JB

Not even Die Hard is Die Hard anymore. John McClane is more Jason Bourne than John McClane these days. I've heard Olympus has fallen was better, so I'm just going to pretend that's the real Die Hard 5 and I just hallucinated that other thing where Bruce Willis goes to Russia.

Downey is no Ahnold, but that guy's still built. I'm sure all these hypothetical women who are so hot for geniuses are much less impressed by the sight of an actual skinny, nerdy smart guy. 

I thought she defined both pretty thoroughly ...

 

Nowadays, real men drive hybrids, extol super-foods and worry more about core muscles and resting heart rates than the size of their pecs. Smart is the new sexy, struggling the new strong, insecurity a form of seduction.

The hoardes of smart, struggling and/or insecure guys coming here asking how to land a date would seem to indicate she's wrong.

 

JB

Or the hordes of guys just begging to know what shoes or hair cut or type of music is manly so that they can follow some guidebook on what will make them a man based purely on appearances wihtout any depth?

 

Yeah, I read that part, and I thought it was horribly written, it didn't convey shit towards what she was wanting to say. Which is why I said the article and the topic needed a much better author.

Still ... it betrays her point.  Smart isn't the new sexy.  Insecurity isn't seduction.  Women don't like insecurity in men.

 

She raises Robert Downey's Tony Stark to prove an earlier point about how action heroes have changed -- which they really haven't -- but completely misses how Stark is a counterexample to her point about how 'insecure' is the next big thing in men. Stark is so 'secure' that he's obnoxious.


She's talking out of her ass ... and, I think she knows it.  She likes a women-as-warriors, men-as-wallflowers paradigm -- even if she probably wouldn't want to date a wallflower.  She likes the idea of angsty, weak, insecure men as "real men" ... and secure, strong women as real women.

 

It strikes me as wishful thinking from somebody who wants her team to have the upper-hand in a gender competition.


JB

   She could find some kindred spirits on the writing team for NBC's Once Upon a Time . They could have titled it; Ineffectual Male Characters, if they were going for honesty.

    Granted, the show is a fairy tale rendering of a soap opera, but I've never seen male characters faint and swoon with such frequency. And it's a downhill slope, one can only be unconscious for so long before brain damage starts to set in.

She should have brought up Tobey Maguire's Spiderman instead of Downey's Stark, if she was going to make that point.

True.  Though Peter Parker has always been a whiny teenager ... and I don't know that his insecurity qualifies as "seduction".  Not sure you can prove much of a point about men with a teenager as your example, either.

 

Would've made the point better than Stark.

 

JB

Parker has been angsty since Stan Lee introduced him in the 60's.  He was written that way on purpose, so kids without a strong male role model could relate to someone struggling to make it on their own without guidance.

I really think this may be more geographic than it seems.  The US isn't as homogenous as she wishes it were.  She's writing from California.  The coasts like to think of themselves as the cultural centers of the country ... but they're more fringe than they'd like to believe.


JB

RSS

Latest Activity

Seitanist Dan replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"Is true; I got a 90 on my English Regents, got into English AP, I'm a budding writer and I love to read; yet I curse up a storm. Typically, however, not at other people...."
8 minutes ago
Tyler M. replied to David R.'s discussion Profanity and Vulgarity
"Article about vocabulary and using "cuss" words:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/swearing-vocabulary-smarter_us_56707516e4b0fccee170417a I cuss very regularly (unless speaking to strangers) and max out English scores on any…"
18 minutes ago
Dominic replied to John Muir's discussion Now the time for a gas tax to pay off the national debt? in the group The Great Debate
"Federal spending as a part of GDP has actually gone down under Obama more than 4%.  At the same time, so many private companies are dependent on federal spending. So many salaries are paid by the government, monies that go on to pay for…"
24 minutes ago
David R. posted a discussion

Profanity and Vulgarity

My two 30-something sons tape a cable show called Penn & Teller: Bullshit! and I watch an episode every so often when I'm in the mood for something humorous and a bit risqué. I just watched the latest which was on the subject of profanity.Personally, I make a great distinction between profanity (as in using the Lord's name in vain) and vulgarity (as in using offensive or rude words).Generally I will say "Rats!" when something happens like I drop something.  Even though this word is old…See More
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Joshua M's discussion How important is your choice of college major (Particularly for Engineering)?
"Depends on the college.  Some are diploma mills and some are excellent.  Before someone says "like here," I'll say:  not like here.  Greater range."
9 hours ago
Chuck Knight replied to Justin's discussion Tips on waking up earlier?
"It sounds like, at a fundamental level, your sleep quality is lacking. You say you sleep, but wake up exhausted and unable to function. Yes, time. Yes, daylight. Yes alarm clocks, yes, yes. But it all boils down to waking up because you're…"
10 hours ago
Liam Strain replied to John Muir's discussion Now the time for a gas tax to pay off the national debt? in the group The Great Debate
"1. The US economy is not a household budget. Some principles do apply to both, but overall - comparing them, even as an analogy, fails on several levels.  2. Absolutely, the debt should be dealt with. Growing faster afterwards is possible...…"
11 hours ago
Jack Bauer replied to John Muir's discussion Now the time for a gas tax to pay off the national debt? in the group The Great Debate
"Makes some sense.  If you overspend yourself into credit card debt ... cutting-up the credit cards cuts your effective income, and using your actual income to pay it off reduces does so further.  Less to spend because you already spent…"
12 hours ago

© 2016   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service