Hello there!

I've a question for the more sartorially experienced forum members here on AoM: Will wearing a three-piece suit's pieces separately wear their colours out over time, perhaps to the point that there is a noticeable difference should I wear them all together on occasion?

Tags: suit, suits, three-piece, waistcoat

Views: 2759

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wear them together, never separate a suit. Nobody will thank you for doing this heinous crime.
Blazers are cut a specific way, and proper blazers bear club buttons. I wouldn't recommend wearing a three piece with other items of clothing. Wear the vest and pants together (without the jacket,) maybe. But in my opinion, keep everything together.
I'm a rather formally-dressing person, so my opinion may be biased, but I believe that a three-piece suit should always be worn as one and not pieced out. The only time I would advocate this is when the suit is actually beginning to show it's age. Perhaps, for example, the trousers are worn or the belt-loops are broken, so you leave them at home and wear the waistcoat with a seperate suit, or the waistcoat is too tight and the buttons have come off, you leave that at home and wear the other parts as a two-piecer.

If all components of the suit are in good condition, then wear it as a suit.

Plus, you'll look much smarter that way.
Do not "piece out" a three piece suit- or you will risk looking like a pikey.
Two options for a 3-piece suit-

1) Wear the suit with waistcoat; or
2) Wear suit without waistcoat.
Quite.
My mom always taught me that the difference in wear came from washing them separately. If you choose to wear one piece of the suit more than the rest, make sure the entire suit is always dry-cleaned together.
Thanks for all the responses, guys! You've all helped me decide to simply go with the more common two-piece suit, which I will perhaps just compliment with a separately purchased waistcoat or two. I've seen some people go with black waistcoats with grey pants (and vice-versa), and I have to admit that while unconventional, they look pretty alright.

Going back to the matter of breaking up a suit's pieces, I found this shot of J. Crew's Frank Muytjens interesting.

If I ever decide to break up any suit of mine on occasion, I will likely be using Micah's good advice later on.
I like the look of the denim shirt and suit pants a lot. I was actually going to mention this article if no one else did.
On wearing the suit without the vest/waistcoat, keep in mind that it can affect the fit of the jacket.
You may find that the sleeve length is too long without the vest, etc.

I would never really wear them separately, although I have worn them without the vest - I just try to wear a shirt with slightly longer sleeves that day.

Also, it's almost always the trousers that wear out first, unless you really wear the jacket all day - in which case the elbows may get worn out before them. Getting an extra pair of trousers when you first get the suit is a good idea, if you can manage it.
Here's the deal. Have fun with your wardrobe. If you can trust your instincts as to whether or not something looks good, then try stuff on and make your decisions based on that.
Gentlemen,

Perhaps this doesn't apply today, but during the colonial era on through post-bellum Civil War era I believe that it was a common practice to interchange articles of clothing within a suit. For example:

During the colonial era of the United States, many gentlemen often did not own more than two or three full suits. These three piece suits consisted of knee breeches, waistcoat, and outer coat. Sometimes, these three piece suits would match in both colour and material: they would be referred to as "ditto" suits. If I'm not mistaken, a ditto suit was incredibly rare, as most American gentlemen of the era could not afford to purchase all three parts of the suit at the same time. Therefore, a three piece suit with unmatched colours and material was socially acceptable during the period.

However, a gentleman of good standing, during the colonial era, would never be seen without his waistcoat. Leaving his home without his waistcoat was considered leaving the home "undressed". So at this time, a waistcoat was always worn. Also, the outer coat was most often not buttoned. Although supplied with buttons, the outer coat was left open to display a gentleman's finest article of garb: his waistcoat, thus reinforcing the point that a colonial gentleman would never leave the house in an "undressed" manner.

Today, I don't think it socially acceptable to interchange articles of three piece suits. Also, wearing a separated suit is considered somewhat socially unacceptable (please don't take this as an insult).

Hope you find some use in my inapplicable nonsense.

I remain, ever faithfully,

Your most humble and obedient servant,

--Patrick M B Brenner

RSS

Latest Activity

Leto Atreides II replied to Kit's discussion Mother doesn't accept the fact I prefer to be single..?
"Obligatory. "
6 minutes ago
Jonathan replied to Jake Kempen's discussion Implications of changing my name?
"Is Jake short for Jacob? If so, Jacob is quite a distinguished name."
7 minutes ago
Chu Kim posted a discussion

The Prime Years

When is a man in the prime of his life? I was thinking about this last night when I was out walking my dog. After some rumination and pondering on the topic, I initially concluded that it was about 35. My reasoning is that a man is still relatively young (or he is not an old man), but he has attained some appreciable life experience and knowledge, and probably has reached a position for which he has worked for and sought and finally accomplished. So, in that sense, around 35 you will see a…See More
11 minutes ago
Gentleman Engineer replied to Ruben Cardenas's discussion A Monthly Menu (To Eat Out Less and Save Money)
"In many locales, the bill of electricity is correlated not directly to usage of electricity. Oft, fixed charges dominate the billing."
12 minutes ago
Danny j pasichnyk joined Liam Strain's group
Thumbnail

AoM Secrets and Mysteries

A place for the open discussion of alternative metaphysics, the occult, magick, paganism, and other cosmologies not otherwise represented.
14 minutes ago
Danny j pasichnyk joined Will's group
Thumbnail

The Interpretation of Dreams

For the discussion of particular dreams and their interpretation ("I had this really weird dream last night -- what does it mean?"), or discussion of dream interpretation, Jungian symbolism, Freud, symbol in other venues (myth, for example), or whatever seems relevant.If these aren't exactly the topics of interest; please make suggestions -- or post your topic anyway!See More
16 minutes ago
Ramsay Bolton replied to Kit's discussion Mother doesn't accept the fact I prefer to be single..?
"Why care so much, my mom has thought I was gay on and off for years now.It doesn't bother me. I agree in not wanting a girlfriend or anything either, its not such a big deal."
16 minutes ago
Will replied to Kit's discussion Mother doesn't accept the fact I prefer to be single..?
"You can't win."
19 minutes ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service