Hello there!

I've a question for the more sartorially experienced forum members here on AoM: Will wearing a three-piece suit's pieces separately wear their colours out over time, perhaps to the point that there is a noticeable difference should I wear them all together on occasion?

Tags: suit, suits, three-piece, waistcoat

Views: 2746

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wear them together, never separate a suit. Nobody will thank you for doing this heinous crime.
Blazers are cut a specific way, and proper blazers bear club buttons. I wouldn't recommend wearing a three piece with other items of clothing. Wear the vest and pants together (without the jacket,) maybe. But in my opinion, keep everything together.
I'm a rather formally-dressing person, so my opinion may be biased, but I believe that a three-piece suit should always be worn as one and not pieced out. The only time I would advocate this is when the suit is actually beginning to show it's age. Perhaps, for example, the trousers are worn or the belt-loops are broken, so you leave them at home and wear the waistcoat with a seperate suit, or the waistcoat is too tight and the buttons have come off, you leave that at home and wear the other parts as a two-piecer.

If all components of the suit are in good condition, then wear it as a suit.

Plus, you'll look much smarter that way.
Do not "piece out" a three piece suit- or you will risk looking like a pikey.
Two options for a 3-piece suit-

1) Wear the suit with waistcoat; or
2) Wear suit without waistcoat.
Quite.
My mom always taught me that the difference in wear came from washing them separately. If you choose to wear one piece of the suit more than the rest, make sure the entire suit is always dry-cleaned together.
Thanks for all the responses, guys! You've all helped me decide to simply go with the more common two-piece suit, which I will perhaps just compliment with a separately purchased waistcoat or two. I've seen some people go with black waistcoats with grey pants (and vice-versa), and I have to admit that while unconventional, they look pretty alright.

Going back to the matter of breaking up a suit's pieces, I found this shot of J. Crew's Frank Muytjens interesting.

If I ever decide to break up any suit of mine on occasion, I will likely be using Micah's good advice later on.
I like the look of the denim shirt and suit pants a lot. I was actually going to mention this article if no one else did.
On wearing the suit without the vest/waistcoat, keep in mind that it can affect the fit of the jacket.
You may find that the sleeve length is too long without the vest, etc.

I would never really wear them separately, although I have worn them without the vest - I just try to wear a shirt with slightly longer sleeves that day.

Also, it's almost always the trousers that wear out first, unless you really wear the jacket all day - in which case the elbows may get worn out before them. Getting an extra pair of trousers when you first get the suit is a good idea, if you can manage it.
Here's the deal. Have fun with your wardrobe. If you can trust your instincts as to whether or not something looks good, then try stuff on and make your decisions based on that.
Gentlemen,

Perhaps this doesn't apply today, but during the colonial era on through post-bellum Civil War era I believe that it was a common practice to interchange articles of clothing within a suit. For example:

During the colonial era of the United States, many gentlemen often did not own more than two or three full suits. These three piece suits consisted of knee breeches, waistcoat, and outer coat. Sometimes, these three piece suits would match in both colour and material: they would be referred to as "ditto" suits. If I'm not mistaken, a ditto suit was incredibly rare, as most American gentlemen of the era could not afford to purchase all three parts of the suit at the same time. Therefore, a three piece suit with unmatched colours and material was socially acceptable during the period.

However, a gentleman of good standing, during the colonial era, would never be seen without his waistcoat. Leaving his home without his waistcoat was considered leaving the home "undressed". So at this time, a waistcoat was always worn. Also, the outer coat was most often not buttoned. Although supplied with buttons, the outer coat was left open to display a gentleman's finest article of garb: his waistcoat, thus reinforcing the point that a colonial gentleman would never leave the house in an "undressed" manner.

Today, I don't think it socially acceptable to interchange articles of three piece suits. Also, wearing a separated suit is considered somewhat socially unacceptable (please don't take this as an insult).

Hope you find some use in my inapplicable nonsense.

I remain, ever faithfully,

Your most humble and obedient servant,

--Patrick M B Brenner

RSS

Latest Activity

Todd Heavner replied to Christian's discussion 20 year old looking for advice from you "white collar" gents.....is the money worth it?
"It sounds like you think white collar is all dull and less than manly.  It can be, but doesn’t have to be.  I spent time at two huge corporations, and yes, they were what I would call stodgy.  Now, I’m at a small company…"
20 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
""Koreans are not enslaved." I think that you're just thinking about South Korea there Will.  From all the reports I've seen North Koreans are enslaved by their own government pretty damn well.  If Koreans were some…"
23 minutes ago
Daniel posted a discussion

Should I go for the CPA?

I have long been thinking about adding a CPA to my name.I graduated with a bachelor's degree in history and an economics minor when I was an undegrad. I then went to a master's program in accounting; having completed financial, managerial, cost, and intermediate accounting classes. While I was in the master's program, I received a job offer working for a union funds office as a collections/delinquency coordinator for a multi-employer health and welfare plan. I've been working at this job for 2…See More
26 minutes ago
Rick Shelton replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
""I believe it more likely that I would be the slaver if I were involved in it." You've shown that you have the morals to be a slave seller, which requires simply the lack of moral character and zero physical capabilities. "I…"
27 minutes ago
Leto Atreides II replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
"Damn, you cannot possibly be that fucking stupid. "
2 hours ago
Satanist Dan replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
"No one cares who you can beat up because none of us are going to meet up anyway. "
2 hours ago
Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
""I don't know why I am responding to your asinine comments, " Denny already answered that in his first sentence."
6 hours ago
Lucius Artorius Castus replied to Chu Kim's discussion Slavery is Awesome
"Chu, Nothing you just said refutes what Will said."
6 hours ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service