Greetings gents,

I've written on here in the past for a variety of topics. My question now is for the guys in the military. Former can obviously comment as well, but I'd like to try and get as many guys as possible that are still in or just recently left, for the sake of contemporary issues, if you will... In addition, officers and enlisted alike please comment, but again, for the same reasoning, I'm a little more interested in what the enlisted have to say...

What have been your overall impressions of your commanding officers?

What things did the bad ones and the great ones do to make them that way? What characteristics did they hold? Any memorable events?

Who would you consider to be the most respected and influential officers in the military today? One example I can immediately think of is General Mattis, USMC. Though he did retire recently, the things I hear about him make it sound like guys under his command would quite literally run into hell ass backwards if he told them to.

Just curious to hear what everyone has to say. Thanks in advance...

Views: 169

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I was first enlisted then commissioned in the Army.  I have had some of the best commanders that you could ever ask for and some so bad you would think that I was making stuff up about them because it is impossible to believe that they were allowed to wear a uniform.

One particularly good company commander when I was a SP4 was a female 1LT.  She was very professional and a strapping 6'2".  She watched out for us and worked well with the NCOs but, much to our surprise, seemed to be hated and unsupported by senior officers which may have made us more defensive of her.  We would have been glad to have her in charge in a combat zone.  Her predecessor was not a bad CPT but he wanted to hang out and be every one's friend more than enlisted were comfortable with.  Oh and he got caught wearing a Ranger tab that he was not really supposed to which slightly embarrassed all of us.

MAJ "Fitz" was a great Aviation commander and a little larger than life.  He is who the actor playing an air cav commander in Apocalypse Now was trying to be like.  He had been assigned to our unit when it was deployed to Vietnam many years earlier as a WO1 maintenance officer then received a commission, had 22 years in, and pulled favors to command his favorite unit.  He was very paternal and covered for us even on the rare occasion when were actually in the wrong to the point of threatening to put his cigar out in an infantry officer's eye reminding him that "one eye was a 100% disability so he was about to do his Aviation hating behind a great favor."  He kept his retirement request in a little glass frame behind his desk with a hammer chained to it just in case he went too far so he was rather surprised to be hunted down for LTC and offered a maintenance Bn command.  It might have helped that our OR rate stayed between 98-99% when half the Aviation units could not meet the 70% standard.  It was a "work hard, play hard" unit.  Can't say enough good about him. 

A later commander of the same unit looked very promising but we soon learned that every time he asked anyone to do anything or for their experienced opinions he would "sneak" behind their back and ask someone else.  He did not trust any of us so it was hard for us to ever trust him.  too bad since apart for that terrible flaw he had the makings of a good commander. 

The worst commander that I ever had (I saw an MP LTC that was even worse though) had a terminal little man's disease.  Spiteful, mean, snarky, intolerant, rude, couldn't shoot, stupid drunk, and decided to systematically throw enlisted soldiers out thinking that this somehow made him look good to his boss who flat out told him that it was stupid.  As a commander of a subordinate unit this put me between my soldiers and him frequently (the other 7 commanders were also usually at odds with him too).  Of 16 officers in the Bn 13 of us got out since we could not recover from the train wreck of having him as a commander on our records.  Our Bde commander was far away and did not step in to try and help folks until it was too late.   The Bn was selected to be disbanded. 

Generally I've found my commanding officers to be competent and capable. The Army puts a lot of effort and resources into developing good leadership. Of course there are bad eggs here and there, but the certainly aren't the majority. In my experience most of the folk who go around complaining that they always have bad leaders, are usually dirt bags. If you look around and every leader you've had were a problem, you're probably the problem.

Overall Ive had great experiences with my commanders. The culture of the military is to develop subordinates and invest time into their professional development and education. I believe that, despite the few bad eggs that get through, most of the folks you see in command are top notch. In the next few years as the military draws down this will become more evident. The competition for command slots is becoming more rigorous. Promotions are not guaranteed and review boards are taking a look at officers records. 

There are quite a few influential officers out there, and I would prefer to not name the ones I keep close to me. But if you want ideas on who to look to emulate, check Diaries oF U.S. Grant. Great biography of a leader and also describes the qualities that he needs. An important aspect of being a good leader is being a good follower and he brings this up. 

My 2 cents, good discussion.

RSS

Latest Activity

Shane replied to Pale Horse's discussion The Current Healthcare Issue in the group The Great Debate
"Here's Ryan's bill. I'm curious why Koch's lackeys hated it. SEC. 102. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PROGRAM >additional $422m funding for Medicare/CHIPS 2017 SEC. 103. FEDERAL PAYMENTS TO STATES >no direct Fed funding for…"
55 minutes ago
Themetalman replied to Shane's discussion World's Best Can Opener
"p38 or p51 "
1 hour ago
Jamara Newell joined A.C.'s group
Thumbnail

Autodidacts

A group for those who seek knowledge on their own, with whatever discipline they choose.
1 hour ago
Pale Horse added a discussion to the group The Great Debate
Thumbnail

The Current Healthcare Issue

It's pretty important. I'm surprised it hasn't been brought back up.See More
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"@Nick AWG is not a theory. It's not science at all. WRT Big Oil investing in "Green Tech", they learned their lessons from the railroads. WRT Trump and renewables, he campaigned as pro renewable. His most recent EO on energy…"
1 hour ago
Shane replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"Try reading the Politifact article. Al Jazeera isn't talking about the same wall. That's the very definition of a "Red Herring". They started talking about something else and hoped nobody would notice. Apparently it worked on you."
1 hour ago
Sir replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
1 hour ago
Nick H replied to Nick H's discussion Has AOM jumped the shark or is it's just cyclical in the group The Great Debate
"To Liam. I would disagree. If something is a good investment, investors will invest. Likewise, why would Trump's admin harm an industry if it thought it was profitable? Heck, I doubt even big oil want to end green power seeing as they seem to…"
1 hour ago

© 2017   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service