So, one of my coworkers will have his wedding on november, and another one on december. Hence, a lot of the people I work with will be attending both events.

The problem is I work for an advertising agency and the dress code is far from the Mad Men era. In other words, I don't have a suit other than the one I wore on my own wedding.

Any creative advice on how to spend less money creating two acceptable outfits?

Thanks!

Tags: cheap, outfit, wedding

Views: 332

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You can wear the same thing to both weddings. Lots of men only have one "formal" outfit.

What time of day are these weddings? Where are the ceremonies? Where are the receptions? Is a dresscode indicated?

What color is the paper of the invitations? What color is the writing? Are there images, or just text? Photos, or simple line drawings? [If you're in advertising, you probably recognize that details like this can indicate a "mood" or "feeling" - or, in this case, a level of formality.]

It's perfectly acceptable to wear the same suit to both events.  Unless it's particularly distinctive, most people won't even notice, and even if they do, they're unlikely to care (unless it's really ugly).  A grey or navy suit (or similarly basic color and pattern) will not stand out.  Change up the shirt/tie and you'll have two very different outfits for those who are at both events and paying attention to what you wear (which probably won't be many people, since you're not the one getting married). 

Rebekah: both weddings fall in the "just formal enough to be wearing a suit", but I wouldn't be confortable wearing anything else. You're right about "reading the mood" in the invitation, and also spending so much time with this people gives me a good idea of the kind of wedding they will be having.

Nathanael: thanks for the advice on colour and combinations.

Finally: really? same suit? I never would have tought that was appropriate...

My 1958 etiquette book says a businessman wearing a suit every weekday could get by with owning only 3 all-season suits. That's wearing suits twice in the same week, in the same place, let alone twice in the same season, in different places. And that was the early end of the Mad Men era.

I got married last November. The only men where I can remember what they wore are the groom, groomsmen, the Priests, and my father. And it's not that I've forgotten. I couldn't have told you the day after my wedding, either. And I can't remember what any non-bridal-party-member, male or female, wore to any other wedding I've attended, except what I wore. As long as you're not "that guy" who's dressed inappropriately, no one's paying attention.

I can't figure out how to reply to a specific post! I hit the "Reply" button below each post nad nothing happens... maybe it's my old Safari.

Anyway, that's good news for me, Rebekah: I'll just concentrate on the shirt and tie.

:) < -- happy copywriter.

Shirt, tie and shoes can all be changed out giving you a different look for each occasion.

 

What colour is the suit BTW?

Hi, Steve. Not sure if you mean the one I intend to buy (most likely grey) or the one I used at my wedding (black, of course).

Hi Tomas,

A grey suit will certainly give you more scope for shoe options.

you could could go with a white shirt, maroon/plum tie and black shoes for one day, and a nice blue light shirt, navy tie and oxblood shoes for the other.

Obviously, they are just ideas I'm throwing out there, but you get the picture.

(the second look gives you a chance to channel your "inner James Bond"). ;)

Well that's pretty much the kind of "combo" i was thinking about, but asking around with my coworkers it seems like nobody is going to wear a full suit (at least for the first wedding), and the groom himself told us to "wear wathever we feel like". 

That is very confusing for me, as I don't wan't to show up overdressed. I guess I'll try some sports jacket with less formal troussers and shoes, keeping in mind the color combinations you all have recommended.

My inner James Bond is pissed off...

RSS

Latest Activity

Matthew joined Tookie's group
Thumbnail

Christian Men

Regardless of the specifics, we can all agree on one thing. Jesus Christ was the perfect Man who died and rose again for us such that we could have fellowship with Him
23 minutes ago
Lucius Artorius Castus replied to David Johns's discussion Teen boys today
"Ah... see... I can't wrap my head around existence without given purpose not being pointless. If I get to decide my own purpose, why not have my purpose be nothing? I don't think anyone decides purpose; I think we're hard wired to do…"
30 minutes ago
Steve Dallas replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"Just a job. CEO of say GE or TimeWarner is just a job that has unbelievable influence, not much different from major politicians. Only difference is that on paper the politicians can be voted out"
37 minutes ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"For the office worker, yes. But is it not sad that the leaders of every county, town, state, and nation can be dismissed as "just a job?" But the world will never be perfect, anyway."
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"A compromise thus built upon the scandals and the trials of the government, and to restrict them so? That would be the most logical and realistic solution, should the topic ever be tackled legally. "
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"Fun fact: Walmart greeters get 13USD per hour, significantly above what is suggested here. "
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"That scenario was thought of, and that is a good solution."
1 hour ago
Daniel Rodriguez replied to Daniel Rodriguez's discussion Should the salary of persons in the government be just above, or at, the poverty line? in the group The Great Debate
"Nah, not complaining. Always just curious, thinking. But rarely complaining."
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by Brett McKay.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service